Forums Latest Members

39.5 PO... the perfect Planet Ocean

  1. Yelfel Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    108
    Likes
    130
    Why wouldnt it be?

    40MM is the undisputed champ of dive watch diameter sizes

    14.2MM is chunky enough to give tool-watch wrist presence, but slim enough to fit under every cuff

    Liquid metal and ceramic bezel and dial, cutting edge technology

    8800 movement is Master Chronometer rated, co-axial, and cutting edge technology. I can do without the time zone function and 5 hours of power reserve if it means slimming down 1.5mm in height.

    Just some random thoughts as I work through my latest watch obsession. Some random internet pictures since no post is really complete without pictures. I'll try to upload my own next time I try one on (again):

    IMG_0006.JPG IMG_0007.JPG IMG_0008.JPG
     
    Fusion, Tet, Chaz Goldenrod and 16 others like this.
  2. Df13 Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    456
    It's a really pretty watch, but I still prefer my watches (even dive watches) to be thinner, like the old SMP or Sub. I'm not into this whole "wrist presence" thing.
     
    Fusion, AngelDeVille, rbob99 and 9 others like this.
  3. speedbird Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    875
    Likes
    836
    I thought the thickness of the new Omegas would be a problem, but the PO 42 8500 is far more comfortable than my 116710 GMT Master
     
    rkim11 and Df13 like this.
  4. Df13 Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    456
    Yeah, I'm not a fan of the 6 digit Rolex watches, and I don't like the feeling of the Rolex case backs on my wrist, either. I do like the diameter and thickness of most of their watches, though.
     
  5. speedbird Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    875
    Likes
    836
    The problem for me was the triplock digs into my wrist something awful.
     
  6. yinzerniner Aug 28, 2017

    Posts
    1,869
    Likes
    1,394
    Not gonna lie, the thickness of the PO wasn't as much a factor for fitting it under cuffs than the absurdly oversized helium escape valve. That crown caught on EVERY SHIRT without fail.

    That being said the newer case design does fit a lot better on the wrist so hopefully Omega will continue listening to their supporters and thin out the rest of their Coax range. The Speedy Racing 9300 took a little more than a millimeter off which helps as well.
     
  7. panaitchrono Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    264
    Likes
    142
    I love the Planet Ocean's and it's true that I don't use the chronograph but I like it to be there..:)..who knows..maybe I'll need it sometime.. pic2.jpg
     
    1685, 83n, Martin_J_N and 8 others like this.
  8. BostonCanuck Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    77
    When Omega brings back a 42 mm Planet Ocean at 14.2 mm thick and with a matte dial, then I'll be one of the first in line. Not until.
     
    Perseus and nurseford25 like this.
  9. sevenhelmet Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    440
    Likes
    864
    "39.5 PO... the perfect Planet Ocean"

    Yep!

    Planet Ocean.jpg
     
    rkim11, Walrus, Keef Richards and 6 others like this.
  10. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    17,088
    Likes
    25,329
    Buy your 42mm 2500 now. Mark my words.
     
  11. No.15 Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295
    It's a great looking watch that hits a lot of points for me. Not being a diver, two things bug me about this watch. One is the thickness, and that bugs me about a large portion of the Omega lineup. The second is the big He valve, I don't dive so purchase of this watch would be for aesthetics. Otherwise the diameter is perfect, I like the hands and the bezel. Design wise I think this watch has a lot going for it.
     
    Phase1 likes this.
  12. kangajack Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    62
    Likes
    30
    I'd still choose the 43 PO over the 39.5. For me, the lugs are too short on the 39.5 model. I assume this is to make it more wearable on thinner wrists and ladies wrists specifically because this is the model that is used for women's specific models.
     
    rjdemarco and Willsy182 like this.
  13. sevenhelmet Sep 3, 2017

    Posts
    440
    Likes
    864
    I'd say that's a good assessment. I have 7" wrists, and while I can pull off the 43mm, the 39.5mm looks more balanced for me. If I had beefier wrists (maybe 8"?), I probably would have gone for the 43mm. I will say, it would likely take a woman with big wrists to pull this watch off, even with a daintier strap. On the bracelet, there's no doubt this is a men's watch (at least according to convention- I realize there are exceptions to every rule).
     
    Willsy182 likes this.
  14. drfaulkner Sep 4, 2017

    Posts
    12
    Likes
    59
    "40MM is the undisputed champ of dive watch diameter sizes"
    need to add "for people with small wrists"
     
    Fusion, dazed1, Perseus and 3 others like this.
  15. ras47 Sep 6, 2017

    Posts
    1,798
    Likes
    10,081
    With my 7.75" wrists I have found 40mm to be the minimum for my tastes, and only a few 40mm models make the cut.

    My sweet spot is probably 41/42mm. I have a 44mm Speedmaster and love it, and I used to wear my PO 45.5mm Seamaster daily with no issues.

    Lately, however, I prefer less wrist presence. Something more understated without looking too tiny. I'm thinking about exploring a trade of my 45.5mm PO for a 41mm Seamaster 300M in black. I have a tough time letting go of watches that served me faithfully for a decade.
     
  16. Df13 Sep 6, 2017

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    456
    I'd say for everyone with wrists under 8".
     
  17. ctime3 Sep 7, 2017

    Posts
    967
    Likes
    1,002
     
    IMG_2884.JPG
    Bugster987, PizGloria, Yelfel and 2 others like this.
  18. wilfreb Sep 11, 2017

    Posts
    382
    Likes
    1,026
    I sold my DeepSea because I couldn't deal with the thickness, the same goes to the PO, I always prefer comfort over looks, that's why the SMP is my favorite Seamaster [​IMG]
     
    Fusion, vintage hab, rkim11 and 3 others like this.
  19. wilfreb Sep 11, 2017

    Posts
    382
    Likes
    1,026
    For the vast majority of people, 40mm is the perfect watch size, just look at the best selling timepieces on the planet (Rolex) the are all 40mm, looks good on big and small wrists
     
  20. Riviera Paradise Sep 11, 2017

    Posts
    2,152
    Likes
    3,650
    To be "perfect" it needs to lose that silly protuberance...the HE valve:whistling: