2852 Connie check

Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
I don’t know enough about these older ones to weigh in initially but I also thought the text looked fishy when I first looked at it. Glad someone else with more experience noticed. The I’s in “Officially” are super faded and the Y seems a bit too far away from the crosshair line. Really a lot of the lettering looks too small or a bit off. The theory that it was cleaned up and removed some of the print makes sense to me.
Yes when I blow it up on my giant PC screen, the letters almost appear pixelated.
 
Posts
242
Likes
2,022
IMHO, it’s off.
I’ve two 2852s and both are serif.
The spacing of the first printed line is crowding up under the logo.
Also, the intermediate index ink ticks are usually lines, not dots, as seems to be on the OP dial.

 
Posts
631
Likes
788
Also, the intermediate index ink ticks are usually lines, not dots, as seems to be on the OP dial.
Dots are correct, too. I think it may be a dome vs. pie pan difference.
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,362
2852 is the transition time from dots to lines (more lines than dots)
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
I guess the best thing would be to loupe it and see the back of the dial?