2852 Connie check

Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
I've been offered this SS no date arrowhead. It appears to be a 1st gen early model with the boxy As and sans serif font.

The things that caught my eye were the applied logo being off-center and the OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED line. Specifically the spacing between the wording and the location of the Y as compared to the vertical line.

I have seen others sold with the off-center logo.

I don't have a great pic of the SWISS MADE or the movement yet, which I'm told is a 505 but no pics yet or the back. But the SWISS MADE seems to be in a strange spot I don't recall seeing on Desmond's blog or in the REDIAL pdf.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Thank you! I'm, digging the double "two tone" (SS case/gold hardware + the shimmery border on the dial) and might see about trading it for my kl6312/560.
 
Posts
3,410
Likes
13,210
Yup, looking good. Swiss Made existed both in this position or around the 6 marker. Second hand might be a tiny bit too long?
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Yup, looking good. Swiss Made existed both in this position or around the 6 marker. Second hand might be a tiny bit too long?
Hmmm I see the second hand now that you mention it.
 
Posts
3,410
Likes
13,210
Hmmm I see the second hand now that you mention it.
Just to be clear - if the price is right this wouldn’t stop me from buying it. 😀
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,362
Like a well polished case, all the letters were cleaned and worn out, became skinny and lost the serifs. I would not buy it.
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Like a well polished case, all the letters were cleaned and worn out, became skinny and lost the serifs. I would not buy it.

Ohhh is that why they are missing all the serifs? Interesting.
 
Posts
429
Likes
2,845
Like a well polished case, all the letters were cleaned and worn out, became skinny and lost the serifs. I would not buy it.

Well that’s interesting. The weight of the crosshair and the minute markers are good so I completely missed the serifs. It still ‘feels’ like a genuine period dial, is there any chance this hasn’t been reprinted? Picture added for ease of comparison.
 
Posts
2,854
Likes
4,553
Something seems off on your watch. Feels like a redial on first impression.

You made me get my connies out for comparison. The crystals seem to be a bit cloudy. Probably should try some polywatch on them.



and an overview.



The phone camera does a horrible job (especially as it is now well after midnight.) I do not get these out much.

So many watches, so little time. ... and more parts on the way ...
 
Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
Well that’s interesting. The weight of the crosshair and the minute markers are good so I completely missed the serifs. It still ‘feels’ like a genuine period dial, is there any chance this hasn’t been reprinted? Picture added for ease of comparison.

That close up doesn’t look great actually. @RevZMan123 have you had the watch in hand and viewed under a loupe?
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
That close up doesn’t look great actually. @RevZMan123 have you had the watch in hand and viewed under a loupe?

Nope, fully digital so far.
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Well that’s interesting. The weight of the crosshair and the minute markers are good so I completely missed the serifs. It still ‘feels’ like a genuine period dial, is there any chance this hasn’t been reprinted? Picture added for ease of comparison.

This conversation on Desmond's blog is the only place I see anyone talking about a Connie with sans serif font.


Also, the Constellation script is similarly serif-less.

 
Posts
3,088
Likes
19,936
I don’t know enough about these older ones to weigh in initially but I also thought the text looked fishy when I first looked at it. Glad someone else with more experience noticed. The I’s in “Officially” are super faded and the Y seems a bit too far away from the crosshair line. Really a lot of the lettering looks too small or a bit off. The theory that it was cleaned up and removed some of the print makes sense to me.