26 January 2023 - New Speedmaster - Rife Speculation

Posts
714
Likes
719
and in ceramics? surely the new innovation will be launched in ceramic (dsotm), to renew this family for the 10th anniversary

Maybe, but the metal of the movement itself could still get in the way, combined with how far the NFC tag is away from the front crystal. I sure hope they dont make it part of the dial, would be ugly as hell for a feature I'd never use.
 
Posts
76
Likes
113
How about this;

A new component = a new movement number with maybe even better tolerances. Launch watch model Speedmaster making way for the rest of the models during the next couple of years. So, PO will receive an update along the new movement, AT to follow, then SMP etc. Like when Master Co Ax was announced. A logic way to update all the models in sequence...
 
Posts
29,134
Likes
75,287
I always wondered what happened to the overcoil - hairspring made out of silicone from 2019... e.g.:
https://watchesbysjx.com/2019/06/master-dynamic-silicon-hairspring-hong-kong.html

Breguet has already gained some experience with their own variants:
https://www.breguet.com/en/history/inventions/breguet-balance-spring

Maybe we will see this in a more mass production compatible version...

Based on the photos they have been using, an overcoil won't be part of this...
 
Posts
5,985
Likes
20,561
You all are on to something. Omega's "stay tuned" may be hinting at the longevity in accuracy through new materials.
 
Posts
2,028
Likes
7,160
You all are on to something. Omega's "stay tuned" may be hinting at the longevity in accuracy through new materials.
Even if you are correct, that improvement would not be deemed “massive” by the masses, so I am not buying it. (Doesn’t mean I am correct though… 😁).

I must say that I am indeed intrigued by their teaser! 🤔
 
Posts
2,028
Likes
7,160
@Archer Is there ANY chance that the combined use of the co-axial escapement together with a “perfect” balance Spring (ie, impervious to aging, to magnetism, to temperature differences, to different forces developed over the course of the power reserve, …) that the accuracy and precision of the watches using this new technology could attain levels unheard for mass produced wristwatches!? (For example close to what “observatory grade” calibers used to achieve, or better)?
 
Posts
29,134
Likes
75,287
@Archer Is there ANY chance that the combined use of the co-axial escapement together with a “perfect” balance Spring (ie, impervious to aging, to magnetism, to temperature differences, to different forces developed over the course of the power reserve, …) that the accuracy and precision of the watches using this new technology could attain levels unheard for mass produced wristwatches!? (For example close to what “observatory grade” calibers used to achieve, or better)?

That’s what Omega is using now. So far nothing new has been revealed, at least not anything really obvious...
 
Posts
245
Likes
494
Correct me if im wrong, but dont most or all current Omega calibers have a silicon Balance Spring/HairSpring? isnt that what the Si14 marking is?
Why would a silicon balance spring be some sort of revolutionary thing, if they already have it?
 
Posts
39
Likes
123
If this turns out to be some NFT related garbage, I'm going to lose my sh!t...
 
Posts
2,028
Likes
7,160
If this turns out to be some NFT related garbage, I'm going to lose my sh!t...
I also do not have much faith in this option. Not in line with the direction to which Omega is moving (ie, higher end of watchmaking)…
 
Posts
5,059
Likes
15,577
I think I know what it is…

The Revival of the beloved Speedmaster reduced…but maximized…called the ‘Speedmaster Mini Maxi’…🤪
 
Posts
111
Likes
116
I hope its an official bracelet to fit the FOIS. Or some OEM endlinks to fit the 321 Ed White bracelet to the FOIS...
 
Posts
2,759
Likes
4,355
Is it possible to produce a mechanical watch with parts that would only need a service say once every 20 years or more, and still be considered a luxury product? Even if possible, would a watch company make one considering the drop in revenue?
 
Posts
6,700
Likes
12,321
Lets not forget that Omega was founded 175 years ago ;-)

Also 120 years as it wasn’t until 1903 that Omega was first used in the new company name Louis Brandt et Frère - Omega Watch & Co.
...
🍿
 
Posts
35
Likes
22
No sarcasm here.
Only puting things into context.
Context is everything.

When I get the chance, I shall try to find that discussion on this forum around the X-33 and its limitations for your reference.
That way you can take or leave what you like from it👍

Regardless, they're not approved for EVAs as far as I know, or it would be plastered around the Caseback at every opportunity.
The fact that the caseback text on the X-33 is very hit and miss raises some valid questions which can't be ignored👎
Don't forget, context is everything and marketing is very good at miss truths and half truths.
Don't buy into what you think they are saying. Look for what they aren't saying👍

that’s all great and all

but the battery life isn’t enough to last a return journey to Mars is the bigger flaw in my book…
 
Posts
151
Likes
131
Is it possible to produce a mechanical watch with parts that would only need a service say once every 20 years or more, and still be considered a luxury product? Even if possible, would a watch company make one considering the drop in revenue?
Jewelry like bracelets and chains last decades and centuries, I don't hearing VCA or Cartier complaining.

Servicing profits are nice, but I do not believe they make up a big chunk of their income stream.

With improvements in material science, I am sure a 20-year-service watch would be possible at some point.