Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Slightly better rate? I guess that's one way to loom at cutting the deviation more than in half...馃う
I just checked my two METAS certificates. 3.1s for the Apollo 11 50th Speedy pro and 4.1s for the sapphire Speedy Pro. Life will continue, lol.
So far, it appears so...but I'm not sure I would take a marketing image as gospel...
That's intriguing, although not being a Materials Sciences guy, I'm not real clear on how to interpret, "act on the stiffness of the hairspring鈥檚 attachment point". And so this does what, precisely? In some way changes the oscillating frequency of the Si hairspring, I would gather, but don't really have an understanding of what's going on at a mechanical level.
so Omega can use lower grade techs?
From Omega's press release;
"The innovative solution was a totally new Si14 balance spring which allows the watchmaker to act on the stiffness of the hairspring鈥檚 attachment point through an eccentric adjustment mechanism located on the balance bridge."
That's intriguing, although not being a Materials Sciences guy, I'm not real clear on how to interpret, "act on the stiffness of the hairspring鈥檚 attachment point". And so this does what, precisely? In some way changes the oscillating frequency of the Si hairspring, I would gather, but don't really have an understanding of what's going on at a mechanical level.
From the exploded schematics, it looks like the extra screw will slightly increase or decrease the tension of the balance spring via the flared out bit.
By adjusting the tension of the spring, you can make small adjustments to the frequency of the balance system, which in turn will affect the rate.
As this affects the rate in all directions somewhat equally, it's not helping to reduce delta. Unlike the Si14, it doesn't improve thermal, vibrational, nor isochron issues. It seems to only simplify the task of regulating.