Can't see the back of the dial unless there is a spot through the movement that isn't obvious to my eye. The thickness of the face and its obvious makeup should be clear. Have a pictures of a different form of gold face? I notice much cynicism in the forums, everyone is quick to shout 'fake' or assume that there is something underhanded afoot when something that doesn't fit the mold pops up. It is interesting to see that the evidence does appear to point to a refacing in the sixties, it was certainly not a hack job and was, knowing my father, as a result of regular service from omega. He use to complain about it being expensive but, he loved his watch and saw that it was well cared for. In the 80's maybe earlier, we lived two doors from a watch technician, last name Kalmar, had the hots for his niece, who took care of it for years. I believe he has since passed away. Was fascinated by the little machine that he used to set the speed with its little ticker tape output. Notwithstanding, the watch was never in the hands of a butcher, until me anyway, and has been serviced only by qualified craftsmen. Rather inclined to see what Omega has to say about it, maybe a Christmas present to myself.
