168.010 black piepan dial!

Posts
1,258
Likes
2,736
Hi

I am on a roll for vintage constellation piepan recently. Maybe even more focused in the future.
I just got offered this one with black dial and stated as original dial, original bracelet and looks quite good for a hidden crown. Stilk asking for the movement pix.

Dial shows some degradation but maybe it is expected from a black one.

What do you guys think?
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,706
Hi

I am on a roll for vintage constellation piepan recently. Maybe even more focused in the future.
I just got offered this one with black dial and stated as original dial, original bracelet and looks quite good for a hidden crown. Stilk asking for the movement pix.

Dial shows some degradation but maybe it is expected from a black one.

What do you guys think?

Very interesting - make sure to check out the serial number, as it has one of the less common sharp-edged pie-pan dials which is more commonly seen in 168.010s 馃榾

I have a black dial .004 myself (with the more common dial type) and it is a great watch 馃憤
 
Posts
1,258
Likes
2,736
Very interesting - make sure to check out the serial number, as it has one of the less common sharp-edged pie-pan dials which is more commonly seen in 168.010s 馃榾

I have a black dial .004 myself (with the more common dial type) and it is a great watch 馃憤
I assume it was a 168.004 due to the endlink size maybe 18mm? Which serie should I be expecting if it should be in range for a 168.004 ?
 
Posts
1,258
Likes
2,736
Very interesting - make sure to check out the serial number, as it has one of the less common sharp-edged pie-pan dials which is more commonly seen in 168.010s 馃榾

I have a black dial .004 myself (with the more common dial type) and it is a great watch 馃憤
Yes it should be 168.010 i just corrected the title
Edited:
 
Posts
6,315
Likes
9,761
Case looks pretty good.
Unfortunately, none of the images focus clearly on the dial.
Straight-on, in-focus, images of the dial with hands away from the text would be useful.