Forums Latest Members

145.0022 hand made inner caseback engraving?

  1. kroro Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    Hi all, I bought this Speedmaster recently and would like to ask the expertise on the forum about it. I've done some research myself and everything checks out nicely but the caseback inner engraving is what really confuses me... It's quite well done but obviously not made by machine. Is it a fake caseback? 483xxxxx serial on movement matches with case and there is even a small Omega logo in the middle of the hesalite. Bracelet is a 1499/842 with unmarked endlinks that are very rough (is this also normal?). Thanks for your feedback!

    IMG_20200107_203128.jpg IMG_20200107_223807.jpg IMG_20200107_224844.jpg IMG_20200107_224942.jpg
     
  2. Canuck Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    13,442
    Likes
    37,871
    Machine engraved, IMO.
     
  3. kroro Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    Machine or not, I just haven't found any other inner engravings that look like this. Or maybe I just haven't dug deep enough in this forum... ::book::
     
  4. queriver Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    1,300
    Likes
    2,425
    That's done by hand for sure.
     
    marco and kroro like this.
  5. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    15,458
    Likes
    32,291
    Maybe a badly set up engraving pantograph.

    Screen Shot 2020-01-09 at 12.22.12 AM.png

    Screen Shot 2020-01-09 at 12.22.24 AM.png
     
  6. Badwolf Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    1,095
    I think what was there has been machined off, this has then been added. Definitely not correct.
     
  7. queriver Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    1,300
    Likes
    2,425
    GRSA was a caseback maker in the 1990s but it looks like someone's tried to hand engrave their logo and the other details.
     
  8. ext1 Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    1,134
    Likes
    1,673
    It's done by hand, but the font is surprisingly consistent (145 and 345, SUISSE and SWISS) so I think a badly setup pantograph might be right..

    @kroro luckily it's not such a big big problem, replacement casebacks nowadays are almost the same as the one you should have, it's definitely less serious than something like finding a 90s trit dial
     
    kroro likes this.
  9. Badwolf Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    1,095
    I think your end links should have 842 on them, can't see that in your picture.
     
  10. ext1 Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    1,134
    Likes
    1,673
    kroro and Badwolf like this.
  11. Badwolf Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    1,095
    ext1 and kroro like this.
  12. kroro Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    Thanks everybody for your feedback. I was also thinking it could be a cover up of some sorts after somebody took off the original text but doing new inside engraving seems a bit overkill seeing how the caseback is (somewhat) easily replaceable.
     
  13. kroro Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    What does "JBD" stand for? Found the same initials on the bracelet. Excuse the arm cheese...
    IMG_20200107_225555.jpg
     
  14. ext1 Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    1,134
    Likes
    1,673
    I am not sure what it stands for but deployant clasps also have JBD on them so you're safe
     
    kroro likes this.
  15. Badwolf Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    1,095
    Jet Blast Deflector ;)
     
    kroro likes this.
  16. Canuck Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    13,442
    Likes
    37,871
    I have seen documentaries of watch factory processes used in engraving case backs. In one documentary, an operator was operating a pantograph which was engraving multiple case backs, all in one operation. Not a process which might result in neat, uniform engraving. I can hardly imagine that very rare person who is capable of hand engraving, turning out such a sloppy job.
     
    kroro likes this.
  17. kroro Jan 8, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    So... extremely rare QA error case back? :D

    Does anything on the front look weird? The text and hippocampus?
     
  18. kroro Jan 10, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    56
    I've been spending unhealthy amount of time on the internet the last couple of days scrounging for more information about my mysterious caseback. I'm completely new to the Speedmaster game and just now stumbled upon the late Chuck Maddox's website. Apparently he came across one of these casebacks back in 2005 and had a lengthy discussion on his website how this could never be an Omega original part... that is until in 2008 a user named quatre_temps on WUS got a new caseback for his Speedy, opened it up to find that his "original, factory fresh, untampered caseback had a child like messy stencil that looked like a 2yr old got at it with a scalpel"!

    Long story short - you can read Chuck's original post and the update from WUS here: http://chronomaddox.com/omega/articles/always_ask/always_ask.html.
    Direct links to quatre_temps' threads on WUS:
    https://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/i-think-i-might-have-corrected-chuck-maddox-119406.html
    https://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/*aaugh-*-there-absolutely-no-method-omegas-madness-125854.html

    So it seems that my caseback is indeed original and nothing to worry about. Just too bad that the threads on WUS are so old that all the images have disappeared. Would have been interesting to see other engraved casebacks similar to mine.
     
  19. Pilot85 Jan 12, 2020

    Posts
    264
    Likes
    269
    It looks like a nice watch congrats.

    I will say this is not a 145.0022 but a 3570.50 tritium.
    Based on the Rhodium movement and the Short S on the Dial.
    The bracelet and endlinks are correct for this as well. So only that engraving in the back case is what I don’t like but is hidden so who cares :)

    Enjoy it it has a beautiful Patina.
     
    kroro likes this.
  20. padders Oooo subtitles! Jan 12, 2020

    Posts
    8,977
    Likes
    13,918
    Well strictly speaking it is both. The PIC was introduced at the end of the 1980s to identify the full retail package, the case number is and always was a descriptor of the function of the model, dial colour etc. That speedmaster is indeed a 3570.50.00 but still can be described by its case number. Try ordering parts by PIC alone and you will see how useful a case number is. The tritium 3570 is pretty rare, only made for less than a year AFAIK circa 1997.
     
    Edited Jan 12, 2020
    kroro and Pilot85 like this.