DirtyDozen12
··Thanks, mystery donor!@foil_guy Here is a link to a post that indirectly addresses the issue above: https://omegaforums.net/threads/pretty-movements-anyone.35781/page-2#post-405812
F foil_guythanks, in essence like a single pusher hanhart. As opposed to the chronostop that omega produced.
"Monopusher" and "flyback" are mutually exclusive.
On a 13zn that is true. However, monopusher flyback do exist. I have one.
I believe there are at least two Longines Chronograph movements that can do this.
I do not know the history of the words "monopusher" or "flyback", as they pertain to watch movements. But in my view, they are terms that denote an unconventional design when compared to the normal, two-pusher chronograph. Under this, admittedly, arbitrary assumption, it would not make sense to apply these terms to Longines' stop-seconds movements. I suspect that my motivation to operate under this assumption is that doing the contrary would undermine the functionality of movements like the 13.33Z, 13ZN, and 30CH.
Everything you can do with a 13zn flyback you can measure with a chronostop.
In order to stop the chrono hands of a stop-second movement, constant pressure must be applied to the pusher. This means that one of the wearer's hands is occupied while the chrono is stopped. Furthermore, in order for the chrono to be stopped and not reset, a specific pressure must be applied to the pusher. This could be difficult to execute while wearing gloves, for example. Additionally, when the chrono has been stopped but not reset, the chrono second hand is prone to accidental movement due to the absence of a blocking lever or similar components.
The limitations outlined above are a consequence of the simplified design. And while stop-second movements are capable of being reset while running, they lack basic functionality that is indicative of traditional, flyback chronographs like the 13ZN or 30CH.