105.003-64 Speedy. Help please

Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
The abstract shows if the movement was used on a Speedmaster or not, furthermore if the movement would
not be correct for a 105.003 whatever year they wouldn't even answe, keeping the money...

Yea it would flag if it was a Seamaster movement in a Speedmaster but as the extract doesn’t show the sub reference, it’s not good for highlighting a swapped caseback etc.
 
Posts
10,468
Likes
16,364
OP was clearly dodgy and clearly didn't like that he heard, why else delete the original thread? Can it be put back I wonder?
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
Dear padders, sorry, but I am not interested in showing WWW pictures of a watch i didnt own. For sure, I would rather hear it is all legit and buy it, but in this "configuration", I think it is normal to pass. For me, this is a put together project and I am not interested in collecting single parts. But if you are interested in looking pictures, just google the reference, maybe you are lucky enough to find this bird.
Nevertheless, thanks to the previous guyes which lighten up the dark area.
 
Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
OP it’s considered very bad form to delete a post once comments have been received.
The purpose of this forum is to further knowledge and learning for everyone, not just the person who asked the question. This was an informative post that would have aided others in identifying which elements of this reference are correct and those which cause concern. Without your post this is no longer possible.
 
Posts
3,412
Likes
13,210
But if you are interested in looking pictures, just google the reference, maybe you are lucky enough to find this bird.

Next time you need help with some vintage Omega, just google the reference. Maybe you’ll be lucky enough to find the answer.

The behavior of some people…
 
Posts
6,521
Likes
10,225
OP it’s considered very bad form to delete a post once comments have been received.
THIS!