DotOverNine
·Hello all,
after 15 years in my possession it's time to get to know my watch entirely. It's been an interesting journey. I remember being quite insecure when i was presented to this watch in 2004. At the time i've only had a brand new Speedy. I posted some shots of the watch both in swedish forums and on Timezone. After getting thumbs up from an italian guy named Gino and the late Chuch Maddox on TZ i bought the watch. The reason i chose this particular reference is the close relation to the actual watches been to the moon.
As you all know, back then we didn't discuss the Speedmaster at a very high level of details. But i believe i got a decent piece. I've done my homework but need some help to make my assessment complete.
Please fill in or correct me on the following review!
Reference: ST 105.012-64
Serial no: 2208 7xxx
Case: Unpolished, Asymmetrical case, Twisted lugs, HF Huguenin Freres
My opinion: Not sure of polished or not...
Caseback: A3 double step with Speedmaster engraved on rear
My opinion: should be correct, Seahorse quite visible, same damage after being opened
Bezel: B1 Dot diagonal 70, BASE 500, DOT over 90, DOT next to 70 (lower right), accent over the E
My opinion: should be correct, blueish and in good condition
Movement: Cal 321, A3 – 2nd generation, fully serviced February 2019
My opinion: should be correct and in great condition
Crown: Original, A1 24 teeth, narrow flat feet
My opinion: Hoping it's original, some have told me that it is, matches A1 in MWO, some damage to it
Dial: B2 – Close T, Original stepped dial, Applied Metal Logo, Professional text, SWISS MADE with close spaced T marks, Tritium indices
My opinion: is correct and in good condition, not as sure on lume
Hands: C1 – Baton Drop, Original baton hands and spear chrono hand. Drop end chrono hand. Tritium
My opinion: should be correct, some miscoloring, mostly on the minute hand
Plexi: Original with Omega logo etched
My opinion: correct, not polished in my possession
Pushers: Type 3 Wide & short, Original pushers.
My opinion: looks short and fat necked, but i'm not 100% confident on these
Bracelet: Original 1506/16 with the correct ’16’ endlinks (date stamped) 1 65 means 1st quarter 1965.
My opinion; Is correct, both bracelet and end links, in good condition and with all pieces i believe
And the never ending LUME discussion. What are your thoughts on the lume on the hour markers? My watchmaker believes they are original, after some moist during the years they can look like that. Brownish, a little bit messy look. Not my personal favorite of lume.
What about polishing of the case? This is one of the hardest things for me to judge...
Would also appreciate what you think of the condition of the watch
I have an EoA. Delivered to Sweden in 1965.
And here's the pictures of my early morning photo session.
And the sunny shot =)
Thanks in advance! Wish you all a great saturday! =)
after 15 years in my possession it's time to get to know my watch entirely. It's been an interesting journey. I remember being quite insecure when i was presented to this watch in 2004. At the time i've only had a brand new Speedy. I posted some shots of the watch both in swedish forums and on Timezone. After getting thumbs up from an italian guy named Gino and the late Chuch Maddox on TZ i bought the watch. The reason i chose this particular reference is the close relation to the actual watches been to the moon.
As you all know, back then we didn't discuss the Speedmaster at a very high level of details. But i believe i got a decent piece. I've done my homework but need some help to make my assessment complete.
Please fill in or correct me on the following review!
Reference: ST 105.012-64
Serial no: 2208 7xxx
Case: Unpolished, Asymmetrical case, Twisted lugs, HF Huguenin Freres
My opinion: Not sure of polished or not...
Caseback: A3 double step with Speedmaster engraved on rear
My opinion: should be correct, Seahorse quite visible, same damage after being opened
Bezel: B1 Dot diagonal 70, BASE 500, DOT over 90, DOT next to 70 (lower right), accent over the E
My opinion: should be correct, blueish and in good condition
Movement: Cal 321, A3 – 2nd generation, fully serviced February 2019
My opinion: should be correct and in great condition
Crown: Original, A1 24 teeth, narrow flat feet
My opinion: Hoping it's original, some have told me that it is, matches A1 in MWO, some damage to it
Dial: B2 – Close T, Original stepped dial, Applied Metal Logo, Professional text, SWISS MADE with close spaced T marks, Tritium indices
My opinion: is correct and in good condition, not as sure on lume
Hands: C1 – Baton Drop, Original baton hands and spear chrono hand. Drop end chrono hand. Tritium
My opinion: should be correct, some miscoloring, mostly on the minute hand
Plexi: Original with Omega logo etched
My opinion: correct, not polished in my possession
Pushers: Type 3 Wide & short, Original pushers.
My opinion: looks short and fat necked, but i'm not 100% confident on these
Bracelet: Original 1506/16 with the correct ’16’ endlinks (date stamped) 1 65 means 1st quarter 1965.
My opinion; Is correct, both bracelet and end links, in good condition and with all pieces i believe
And the never ending LUME discussion. What are your thoughts on the lume on the hour markers? My watchmaker believes they are original, after some moist during the years they can look like that. Brownish, a little bit messy look. Not my personal favorite of lume.
What about polishing of the case? This is one of the hardest things for me to judge...
Would also appreciate what you think of the condition of the watch
I have an EoA. Delivered to Sweden in 1965.
And here's the pictures of my early morning photo session.
And the sunny shot =)
Thanks in advance! Wish you all a great saturday! =)