Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Is it possible the 0 represents 12:00AM in 24 hour format? i.e. 00:00
The larger name and logo just looks good to me.
Well to me it fucks up the whole watch. The larger 12 o'clock triangle is iconic to divers and the bezel is just neither a diver, nor a gmt; t's useless. In that sense the watch is just a mess. Pitty because the lollipop and the lume are great. To me that Omega logo makes a watch into a billboard. You're no longer wearing a great diver by omega, you're wearing omega. And not a.dkver, nor a gmt, nor a classic or a modern watch, just a silly photo shoot product
A little like these:
Dude, where's your head!?
Well to me it f**** up the whole watch. The larger 12 o'clock triangle is iconic to divers and the bezel is just neither a diver, nor a gmt; t's useless. In that sense the watch is just a mess. Pitty because the lollipop and the lume are great. To me that Omega logo makes a watch into a billboard. You're no longer wearing a great diver by omega, you're wearing omega. And not a.dkver, nor a gmt, nor a classic or a modern watch, just a silly photo shoot product
With respect, I was not trying to convince anyone to adopt my opinion. I said "The larger name and logo just looks good to me."
With respect, I was not trying to convince anyone to adopt my opinion. I said "The larger name and logo just looks good to me."
I gotta go with @Nobel Prize on this one - new 'LE' to me is a mess - the pinnacle of design by the marketing department - and I love your suit (side tabs, no belt ? Excellent ... And great lapels ) but for me a NATO and a suit might look 'OK' but it just sets off style alarm bells in my head. Tried it, had to turn around and go back to change ( the watch, not the suit ) as it felt too 'affected' ... Just my opinion
Sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone or contradict you, just used your statement as a starting point to mine. My post is also just my opinion not dogma.
I respect your opinion. But styles do change over time. Here is my thought on the matter. For example, white after Labor day is no longer a faux pas and has not been one for some time now. The NATO strap with a suit is one that I choose to adopt. Another example is Sean Connery's James Bond. He wore these straps on his 6538 with a suit first in 1964 in Goldfinger. Granted that is a movie. But the fact is, entertainment and all it encompasses does maneuver styles and establish new standards or rules. And a lot of people do adopt some of these changes.
The only thing I do that many here on OF will think is odd if wearing my NATO while wearing a suit. For everything else I choose to maintain a standard that I set for myself which parallels the classic men's fashion.
As well you should. It's fashionable now to wear suits with no socks. It used to be to wear suits and sneakers...I wear my bracelets and tattoos no matter what I'm wearing. But why make a logo like that one and issue a faux bezel when the watch could have a normal divers bezel or a gmt function ( which would make it truly different while still retaining horologicaly sense, a little like the Rolex gmt is on a diver case and style...that I may have bought) and that Logo just makes no sense at that size....it's too much. I love the omega logo and Iove omega but one off the things I liked is the bespoke quakity of some of its designs while retaining quality and usefulness.
Other aspects of the piece I like.