Joe_A
·Not the first time this watch has appeared here . . .
But definitely the first time shown on a 21st century BOR bracelet.
I own a period Enicar BOR bracelet, but I would never dare to wear it on this or any other watch because it has two flaws that are fairly common to BOR bracelets of the time.
a) It does not have a safety or locking clasp. Rather it has a dimple and a embossing that snap in place and tend to wear, putting a watch at risk. Gauge of the steel is thin.
b) It has hollow or open end-links putting the lugs at risk for scratches.
But some BOR bracelets made today use heavier gauge 316 stainless and a positive locking clasp with safety cover and . . . solid milled end-links polished to a mirror finish on the ends that contact the lugs.
Sorry, old Swiss, but your solution back then was cheesy. 😀
I'll put up a separate thread on this particular bracelet another time.
But definitely the first time shown on a 21st century BOR bracelet.
I own a period Enicar BOR bracelet, but I would never dare to wear it on this or any other watch because it has two flaws that are fairly common to BOR bracelets of the time.
a) It does not have a safety or locking clasp. Rather it has a dimple and a embossing that snap in place and tend to wear, putting a watch at risk. Gauge of the steel is thin.
b) It has hollow or open end-links putting the lugs at risk for scratches.
But some BOR bracelets made today use heavier gauge 316 stainless and a positive locking clasp with safety cover and . . . solid milled end-links polished to a mirror finish on the ends that contact the lugs.
Sorry, old Swiss, but your solution back then was cheesy. 😀
I'll put up a separate thread on this particular bracelet another time.
Edited:

















