Forums Latest Members

Would really appreciate opinions on this Cal. 564 Seamaster!

  1. wl1150 Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    7
    Likes
    3
    Hi all, I'm new to the forum... I have my eyes on this Seamaster with Cal. 564 ref 168.024. I'm new to vintage Omega so I thought I'd get some opinions from the forum. From what I can tell, my main concerns are that the case is over polished and the date window is degraded. However, I would appreciate any additional feedback. Asking $761. Thanks!
     
    Omega 10.jpg Omega 9.jpg Omega 8.jpg Omega 7.jpg Omega 6.jpg Omega 5 .jpg Omega 4.jpg Omega 3.jpg Omega 2.jpg Omega 1.jpg
    janice&fred and Benbradstock like this.
  2. VetPsychWars Wants to be in the club! Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    1,862
    I'm concerned about the movement pic. The part obscured by the rotor ought say adjusted five positons and temperature. Except it's obscured.

    The rest does not bother me.

    Tom
     
    Bill Sohne and Benbradstock like this.
  3. wl1150 Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    7
    Likes
    3
    Ok thanks. I appreciate your response... Will try to get some more movement pictures. If everything checks out, does this seem like a good example for the price?
     
  4. Benbradstock Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    440
    Overall looks like a solid deal to me if that movement issue is resolved. I believe they made far fewer of these than constellations…
     
  5. wl1150 Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    7
    Likes
    3
    Thanks for the input.
     
  6. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Dec 7, 2019

    Posts
    12,607
    Likes
    29,900
    Case shows heavy corrosion, you are unlikely to get anywhere near a watertight seal. Case and bracelet have both seen better days.

    I'd pass and spend a bit more for a nice one, this one isn't.

    Omega 1.jpg
     
  7. Benbradstock Dec 8, 2019

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    440
    Every time I think I might have a useful opinion on one of these posts, a real expert like X350 chimes in with something actually useful.
     
    DaveK and ConElPueblo like this.
  8. Badwolf Dec 8, 2019

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    1,095
    Is it from Japan? They seem to polish anything that moves. You also get these very bleached pictures.
     
  9. Lotus_Eater8815 Dec 8, 2019

    Posts
    284
    Likes
    331
    The pitting around the crown is worrisome. Also, the pictures have too much exposure. This usually prevents an examination as to whether the case has been polished.

    The 168.024 is a little unusual bird that is a good addition to any vintage Omega collection. Mine has been running pretty accurate despite it being a 51 year old watch :coffee:

    The ones belonging to @hoipolloi and @Shabbaz should be your standards as to condition.
     
    Shabbaz likes this.
  10. wl1150 Dec 9, 2019

    Posts
    7
    Likes
    3
    Thank you for pointing that out. I will take your advice and wait for a better one. Glad I checked in here!
     
  11. Bill Sohne Bill @ ΩF Staff Member Dec 10, 2019

    Posts
    3,889
    Likes
    8,951
    Hi
    The movement is not marked adjusted ..... you would see part of it around the rotor .

    this watch has been “serviced” ....

    Good hunting
    Bill
     
  12. Bill Sohne Bill @ ΩF Staff Member Dec 10, 2019

    Posts
    3,889
    Likes
    8,951
    Hi

    Just saw an example on the bay with same position of the rotor ... you can see some of the adjusted verbiage....

    10C7E939-C8DD-4F60-A0D5-D070D2F79E46.png


    Good Hunting
    Bill
     
    janice&fred and Lotus_Eater8815 like this.
  13. wl1150 Dec 10, 2019

    Posts
    7
    Likes
    3
    Thanks for pointing that out... I will make sure to watch out for that in future examples. The one you found looks very tidy.