saulgoodman
·Nope, just trying my best to educate people. Some are willing to listen, and some clearly not.
OK professor. LMAO!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Nope, just trying my best to educate people. Some are willing to listen, and some clearly not.
Nope, just trying my best to educate people. Some are willing to listen, and some clearly not.
Anyone who has held a trilogy Railmaster in real life knows what kind of shapes Omega can create with sapphire. And no milky ring, either. That crystal is a masterpiece LOL
Point is, Omega can and already has created truly domed sapphire. It just hasn't bothered to put it on a Speedmaster yet.
Yes the Railmaster has a great sapphire crystal but it isn’t quite the same geometry as the Hesalite Speedmaster crystal. The optical distortion created by the RM crystal is also different to that created by the Hesalite.
Could Omega create a Speedmaster crystal in sapphire with the same geometry as the Hesalite crystal? Probably.
Would a sapphire crystal with the same geometry give the same optical impression? I don’t think it would due to the differences in refractive indices of the two materials.
So which crystals do I prefer (I own all three types)? The Hesalite!
I get it. Personally, I never disputed what you said and I understood your point about the sapphire being domed. When I said some of the back and forths were irrelevant, I meant in the context of what I believed (and still believe) to be the actual intended discussion point of this thread, which is that some people would prefer the sapphire crystal to better match the hesalite version. I didn't mean the distinctions and definitions also being bandied about are literally irrelevant. It just seemed to me we were starting to discuss two or three different things simultaneously. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it happens all the time LOL
Now that’s obsequious.
Dude! How is your RM holding up, and are you still loving it? I'm beyond happy with mine. Thrilled, really.
Separately, well, I never said the shapes or properties of the RM sapphire and Speedy hesalite were remotely the same. I said that if you see what they created with the RM crystal, you might reasonably think they could get closer in shape to the Speedy hesalite than they have done so far. Admittedly I know zero about manufacturing crystals, so maybe I'm wrong.
The only disadvantage of hesalite is that you can’t use it to reflect sunlight into your enemies’ eyes.
I think this is probably a good place to tell you that it is not all about you, although you seem fixated on pushing an issue that as the other poster perfectly pointed out is completely irrelevant to the conversation. You are just another voice in the wilderness. I gather that many here in their obsequious way yield to you opinion, but like the man said, just because you know how to change the oil in a Formula One race car it doesn't make you Mario Andretti.
It’s been my experience that readers stop paying attention to sentences exceeding about 33 words. And just because you own an Omega and can post on OF doesn’t make you @Archer . Learning from @Archer about watches is a lot like watching Mario Andretti drive. You can sit back and enjoy the talent, or get mad because you’ll never be that good. Choice is yours.
I don't know what generation Speedmaster this is... but the Speedmaster I used to own never had a crystal this shape. I bought it about 1999-2000.