Why does the Globemaster slowly sneak up on you?

Posts
47
Likes
125
The jumping hour hand isn't a feature of this watch only. It's typical for the movement which is used in many other models that have nothing to do with travel.

If you'd market this as a travellers watch it would get slaughtered in comparison with real travel watches that have GMT or world timer complications.
Yes, of course the 8900 movement is present on other models, but the point being that it makes more sense to highlight it in the marketing material to better justify calling it a "Globemaster". And I don't agree that it would get bad press or slaughtered. In fact, I've seen this feature get praised in many reviews. Its actually one of the main features that drew me to this watch and the only one where the name makes sense with the movement. I wouldn't have even considered it otherwise.
I find it more convenient than some "office" GMTs or world timers that don't have a jumping local hour hand and are all marketed as "travel watches". For me the Globemaster holds its own even against a Rolex GMT (which I own and love for what it is: a tool watch). Its cleaner and uncluttered making it more versatile. I've found that having a jumping hour hand is good enough on trips unless you're a pilot or someone that absolutely needs to track multiple time zones. Having a GMT hand or a bezel would absolutely ruin the lines of this watch anyway. A hidden home hour hand would be another story however and a welcome addition if it doesn't add thickness. I have a JLC Dualmatic with this feature and its awesome. That would make it even more Globemaster-ish (I hope Omega is listening)...
Edited:
 
Posts
420
Likes
490
Yes, of course the 8900 movement is present on other models, but the point being that it makes more sense to highlight it in the marketing material to better justify calling it a "Globemaster". And I don't agree that it would get bad press or slaughtered. In fact, I've seen this feature get praised in many reviews. Its actually one of the main features that drew me to this watch and the only one where the name makes sense with the movement. I wouldn't have even considered it otherwise.
I find it more convenient than some "office" GMTs or world timers that don't have a jumping local hour hand and are all marketed as "travel watches". For me the Globemaster holds its own even against a Rolex GMT (which I own and love for what it is: a tool watch). Its cleaner and uncluttered making it more versatile. I've found that having a jumping hour hand is good enough on trips unless you're a pilot or someone that absolutely needs to track multiple time zones. Having a GMT hand or a bezel would absolutely ruin the lines of this watch anyway. A hidden home hour hand would be another story however and a welcome addition if it doesn't add thickness. I have a JLC Dualmatic with this feature and its awesome. That would make it even more Globemaster-ish (I hope Omega is listening)...
I'm not saying you shouldn't enjoy your watch and use it the way you see fit, I just mean it was never intended to be a travel watch. Omega already had movements with a quickset hour hand so it was not a novelty and the name Globemaster originated from a trademark dispute 馃榾

I'm sure if Omega wanted it to be a travel watch they would have added some complication that makes it one. As cluttering the dial wasn't an issue for them because they did it with the annual calendar model.
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
I do know the story behind the Globemaster name and the Constellation trademark issue. I'm not sure though that this latest version was "never meant to be a travel watch". Otherwise, they could have easily fitted it with the 8800 movement and called it something else. The trademark issue is no longer a problem, so why chose that name? Just a convoluted historical tie to solve a trademark dispute? Just because its sounds cool? A disconnect between the product design and marketing arms of Omega/Swatch group? That having been said, neither you nor I are the authority on this. Only Omega could answer that question.

It just makes sense to me to tie the Globemaster name and jumping hour function together nicely in a marketing campaign. The jumping hour function has no other benefit besides travel as far as I'm concerned. If you know of one, then by all means please educate me. You could even make the argument that all the other watches fitted with the 8900 or 8500 movement are good for travel (which they are). However, they don't have a name like "Globemaster" that clearly evokes it.
Edited:
 
Posts
15,242
Likes
44,766
I do know the story behind the Globemaster name and the Constellation trademark issue. I'm not sure though that this latest version was "never meant to be a travel watch". Otherwise, they could have easily fitted it with the 8800 movement and called it something else. The trademark issue is no longer a problem, so why chose that name? Just a convoluted historical tie to solve a trademark dispute? Just because its sounds cool? A disconnect between the product design and marketing arms of Omega/Swatch group? That having been said, neither you nor I are the authority on this. Only Omega could answer that question.

It just makes sense to me to tie the Globemaster name and jumping hour function together nicely in a marketing campaign. The jumping hour function has no other benefit besides travel as far as I'm concerned. If you know of one, then by all means please educate me. You could even make the argument that all the other watches fitted with the 8900 or 8500 movement are good for travel (which they are). However, they don't have a name like "Globemaster" that clearly evokes it.


To me, the most obvious benefit of the individually adjustable hour hand is that you don鈥檛 have to disturb the minute and seconds hand when you change time zones, or otherwise have to adjust for the time change to DST, or back again. If you pride yourself in the accuracy of your watch, this most certainly is a factor.
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
Right. Like when travelling.Omega describes it themselves as a timezone feature.
 
Posts
63
Likes
186
I must have tried the globemaster on 10 times at various shops. Somehow, when I finally bought it, it was so much better. All of my friends and I agree it鈥檚 one of the finest watches omega currently makes. And I don鈥檛 understand the bracelet critiques, I think it鈥檚 simply wonderful.
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
Great photo of a beautiful watch. That white dial with all steel is so understated and elegant. I agree that its one of Omega's finest (hidden) gems. It doesn't get the love it deserves.
The bracelet critiques are a bit of nitpicking I agree but for a flagship product, people's expectations are high. My only problem with the bracelet is the finishing between the links which could be better (that area is hardly exposed but still) and a micro adjustment feature which is really useful and becoming a standard these days. I don't however see why people are complaining that the bracelets are sharp or uncomfortable and that there's a huge gap between the first link and endlink when worn. Neither is an issue for me nor has the bracelet ever pulled hairs on my wrist (and I have plenty). I really like the bracelet's heft and design which I think complements the watch perfectly. I'm also glad that its all polished. Could it be improved, sure, but its far from being a bad design.
 
Posts
86
Likes
44
I acknowledge and agree with the points made in your post. I owned a blue dialed GM at one point. I loved the dial, wasn鈥檛 crazy about the fluted bezel, and hated the bracelet because I could never get a precise fit. The watch was always sliding up and down my wrist. I probably wouldn鈥檛 have sold the watch if I had purchased it on the strap. That being said, THIS is my idea of a pie pan Constellation:

Did you consider having a nice strap made? Genteel Handmade would have been happy to oblige:

 
Posts
7
Likes
28
I have the SS blue GM and I wear it all the time. Whether I'm in a suit or sweatpants, it never feels out of place. I had just gotten my first full time job when Omega announced the GM at Baselworld in 2015. I knew from that instant that I would someday purchase a GM...

Well 6 years later, I finally saved up the funds and I have my first modern Omega! I hope your GM brings you as much joy as mine has 馃憤
Now THAT is an elegant timepiece!
 
Posts
532
Likes
347
Saw one of these at a botique last week. It's an absolute unit.
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
Best three hander Omega makes imho! I'm enjoying the heck out of mine on the bracelet. Maybe when the honeymoon is over, I'll try some straps to change things up a bit.
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
I actually like this look more than the Aqua Terra. Maybe I need more time to look at them both, but at first glance man it's a beauty especially that dial.
For what its worth, I had a blue dial Aqua Terra and sold it before getting the Globemaster. Its an awesome watch on paper but it just didn't sing to me on the wrist. Sure it was more affordable, had a screw down crown and more water resistance but I didn't fall in love with it. I found the 38mm a bit too small and the 41mm a bit too large for my wrist. 39mm seems to be my sweet spot but your mileage may vary. And that Pie Pan dial is just so unique!
Edited:
 
Posts
86
Likes
44
Is it the beguiling sunburst pie-pan dial? Is it the knurled bezel? Is it the undercut lugs and profile that looks like a 60's sports car? Is it the retro-futurist vibe? Is it all those things? I didn't even like this watch when I first saw it. It looked boring. A mistake. Then I actually tried one on!
The Globemaster moniker makes more sense for this modern reference. The 8900 movement with the jumping hour hand is perfect for travel. This "hidden" feature is seldom discussed when considering the Globemaster and why the moniker is befitting. The callback to past Constellations all work in perfect harmony. The C-case, the knurled bezel (which I didn't like at first), the iconic pie-pan dial, the observatory medallion and three link bracelet all add to a cohesive whole.
For me, it just works in the Sedna gold/steel combo. It brings out the details. It adds contrast. The brushed center links are understated and dare I say sophisticated. The light play on the hands, indexes, and Constellation star are mesmerizing. The combination of blue dial and Sedna accents give a premium look and feel.
It sneaks up on you, and before you know it, becomes your favorite watch! 馃グ

"The C-case"?
 
Posts
47
Likes
125
The older C-cases were considerably thinner in the midcase but yes, similar overall shape.
 
Posts
39
Likes
43
Been in love with the GM ever since release coming from a Constellation enthusiast since 17 years of age when I got my first Omega Constellation for $40!! The original DNA on the GM is very well preserved hence the familiar looks when passionately observed. Well done on the photos! Great perspective!