What vintage Longines is on your wrist today?

Posts
1,411
Likes
4,303
There is at least one other.
aN9Gxb7.jpg

Came up for auction not that long ago.

Edited:
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
An early waterproof tank watch, invoiced on 1942, with a gilt dial. Reference 21453 and has a cal 25.17 inside
 
Posts
2,776
Likes
4,816
An early waterproof tank watch, invoiced on 1942, with a gilt dial. Reference 21453 and has a cal 25.17 inside
Neat watch, thanks for sharing. "21453" should be the order number. The reference number should be 4 digits long. Maybe the reference number is 4808? Also, maybe you are already aware, but the dial looks to have been refinished. Below is an example of a ref. 4808 with an original dial, followed by an original black dial for cal. 25.17.


https://www.carsandwatches.com/watches/longines-waterproof-tank-watch-oversize-1943
https://meticulouswatches.com/colle...te-steel-tank-watch-cal-dot-25-dot-17-sold-71
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
Neat watch, thanks for sharing. "21453" should be the order number. The reference number should be 4 digits long. Maybe the reference number is 4808? Also, maybe you are already aware, but the dial looks to have been refinished. Below is an example of a ref. 4808 with an original dial, followed by an original black dial for cal. 25.17.


https://www.carsandwatches.com/watches/longines-waterproof-tank-watch-oversize-1943
https://meticulouswatches.com/colle...te-steel-tank-watch-cal-dot-25-dot-17-sold-71

The reference actually is 4860. Honestly, all the expert collectors I've shown the watch to, agreed that the dial is original. As I mentioned it's a galvanic dial (the digits are mirrored gold) which I'm told is not possible to refinish.

I like it anyway 😀
 
Posts
1,820
Likes
27,947
The reference actually is 4860. Honestly, all the expert collectors I've shown the watch to, agreed that the dial is original. As I mentioned it's a galvanic dial (the digits are mirrored gold) which I'm told is not possible to refinish.

I like it anyway 😀
I love it. Looks better than said original dials any day. Enjoy it!!
 
Posts
2,776
Likes
4,816
The reference actually is 4860. Honestly, all the expert collectors I've shown the watch to, agreed that the dial is original. As I mentioned it's a galvanic dial (the digits are mirrored gold) which I'm told is not possible to refinish.

I like it anyway
Thanks for sharing the reference number. The important thing is that you like the watch. For me, these water-resistant rectangular cases are very appealing.

With regard to the dial's originality, I strongly disagree with the expert collectors that you've shown the watch to. To me, the dial has multiple anomalous characteristics that suggest that it is not original. The first is the signature. The font does not resemble the ones used by either Fluckiger & Cie or Stern Freres in this period. The dials I showed above, for example, both have typical signatures that are recognizable as being produced by Stern Freres. The second issue is the hour numerals. These appear to have been inspired by 1920s radium dials, but are very atypical on a 1940s dial. Further, their execution lacks the fineness that I would expect from an original dial. Also, is the off-white material in the numerals luminous? The color is certainly not indicative of radium from the 1940s. Also, one would expect pencil-style hands to be paired with a luminous dial of this type in the 1940s. I think it is possible that the present feuille hands are original, but they were likely blue and paired with a non-black dial, originally. I will post a couple more examples for reference.

As for the dial being galvanic, this usually refers to a process in which a brass dial blank is first plated in gold, then receives temporary printing, then receives a black color, and then the areas where the temporary printing was applied are relieved of their printing to expose the gold-plating beneath. Another, arguably more accurate term to describe this process is “a épargne”. Just like any other dial, these layers can be removed in order to refinish the dial. Were there dial restorers who used the “a épargne” process to refinish dials? I don’t see why not.

223225-cb48679504a760ce384ea5930c529a4b.jpg
https://omegaforums.net/threads/new-member-longines-1943-waterproof-tank-carre.38302/#post-442164


https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...hUKEwjNoMDqwLr6AhVQs3IEHavMBHUQMygCegUIARCyAQ
 
Posts
1,820
Likes
27,947
Thanks for sharing the reference number. The important thing is that you like the watch. For me, these water-resistant rectangular cases are very appealing.

With regard to the dial's originality, I strongly disagree with the expert collectors that you've shown the watch to. To me, the dial has multiple anomalous characteristics that suggest that it is not original. The first is the signature. The font does not resemble the ones used by either Fluckiger & Cie or Stern Freres in this period. The dials I showed above, for example, both have typical signatures that are recognizable as being produced by Stern Freres. The second issue is the hour numerals. These appear to have been inspired by 1920s radium dials, but are very atypical on a 1940s dial. Further, their execution lacks the fineness that I would expect from an original dial. Also, is the off-white material in the numerals luminous? The color is certainly not indicative of radium from the 1940s. Also, one would expect pencil-style hands to be paired with a luminous dial of this type in the 1940s. I think it is possible that the present feuille hands are original, but they were likely blue and paired with a non-black dial, originally. I will post a couple more examples for reference.

As for the dial being galvanic, this usually refers to a process in which a brass dial blank is first plated in gold, then receives temporary printing, then receives a black color, and then the areas where the temporary printing was applied are relieved of their printing to expose the gold-plating beneath. Another, arguably more accurate term to describe this process is “a épargne”. Just like any other dial, these layers can be removed in order to refinish the dial. Were there dial restorers who used the “a épargne” process to refinish dials? I don’t see why not.

223225-cb48679504a760ce384ea5930c529a4b.jpg
https://omegaforums.net/threads/new-member-longines-1943-waterproof-tank-carre.38302/#post-442164


https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://i.pinimg.com/originals/2c/fc/ea/2cfceadd28d865d07a98d5466a043950.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.pinterest.com/pin/265079128042180305/&tbnid=8J_DCYxuOGyGlM&vet=12ahUKEwjNoMDqwLr6AhVQs3IEHavMBHUQMygCegUIARCyAQ..i&docid=WBwZNFTqpDGw8M&w=1600&h=1600&q=longines 1940 tank&ved=2ahUKEwjNoMDqwLr6AhVQs3IEHavMBHUQMygCegUIARCyAQ

Sir, you need to write a book on Longines. I will surely buy it. Just don’t price it at $400 USD
 
Posts
1,820
Likes
27,947
A wristwatch in stainless steel bearing the reference 4630. It is fitted with a Longines manually wound mechanical movement, caliber 12.68N and was invoiced on 13 April 1940 to the company Goldsmiths and Silversmiths, via Baume & Co., which was at that time our agent for the UK.
 
Posts
2,776
Likes
4,816
Sir, you need to write a book on Longines. I will surely buy it. Just don’t price it at $400 USD
Ha! Maybe one day. Or maybe a dedicated website. I appreciate the feedback. 😀
 
Posts
321
Likes
839
A nice local catch sei tacche with pumpkin toned dial, twisted 18mm lugs and unpolished case with a fine double step.