What have we got here Omega Speedmaster 105.003 65

Posts
4,402
Likes
5,802
The odds of my hair regrowing overnight are better.

and after losing sing 'a bit of hair' myself, have just enough experience to suggest graciously conceding the obvious here ...
 
Posts
597
Likes
406
Hi,
I have exactly the same dial on my 1965 105.003 I was always curious if it was original to the watch. My serial is a very very early 25M

Hi and welcome

A picture of the dialside would be great too. 馃槈
 
Posts
383
Likes
149
A straight lugs movement is a bit different then the twisted but i've already commented a 24.9* mill exists for the 105.003-65 so why not an early 25 mill ?
Anyway, pictures would help.
 
Posts
597
Likes
406
Its not about the serial number.. my 105.003 has a 260... number.
But i would love to see another of these dials for ref
 
Posts
4,440
Likes
18,258
A straight lugs movement is a bit different then the twisted but i've already commented a 24.9* mill exists for the 105.003-65 so why not an early 25 mill ?
Anyway, pictures would help.
What is different between the straight and twisted lug cased movements? To my knowledge the 321s are identical throughout the production batches for Omega?