Weak link in Seamaster 300M bracelets?

Posts
4
Likes
7
Just wondering if anyone has heard of, or experienced any problems with bending or weakness in the cutout in the inner link of the diver's extension on the OEM bracelet on the Seamaster 300M?



I purchased my Seamaster in July, and I love it, but I noticed some slight bending where the link in the diver's extension is machined to go around the pin in the two-part link in the extension (please see attached photo).



What troubles me is that there is only perhaps about a millimeter of steel at the bottom of that cutout, and it seems to me that it wouldn't take too much bending or flexing for that to weaken and eventually break, which would result in the watch coming off my wrist (and hitting the ground) at best, and being lost forever at worst. Who knows when or where this might happen? I do not dive, but this watch is my 'daily driver', and I do wear this watch kayaking, and use the diver's extension over my wetsuit. If the bracelet were to break while kayaking there would be almost no chance of ever finding it. To have this weak link on the bracelet of a relatively expensive watch worries me. I suppose I could always purchase the $300.00 OEM Omega rubber strap for my watch, but I like the bracelet and assumed that it would be stronger than the strap. Perhaps not? Anyone else noticed this, or heard of problems?
Thanks!
Edited:
 
Posts
404
Likes
462
I can't see anything wrong with your bracelet. It's still steel, a lot of force is necessary to make it bend or break. Nothing to worry about. I would guess that a spring bar would be the first to break.

Diver extensions of the past were even thinner and looked more fragile but always got the job done.

vintage-93150-oyster-bracelet-extension-diver-s-link-rolex-submariner-5512-5513-1680-1665-.jpg
 
Posts
4
Likes
7
I can't see anything wrong with your bracelet. It's still steel, a lot of force is necessary to make it bend or break. Nothing to worry about. I would guess that a spring bar would be the first to break.

Diver extensions of the past were even thinner and looked more fragile but always got the job done.

vintage-93150-oyster-bracelet-extension-diver-s-link-rolex-submariner-5512-5513-1680-1665-.jpg
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I suppose that you are right about the spring bar breaking before the link, but I am still surprised that a manufacturer with Omega's reputation for quality would invest so much in the watch, and build a bracelet that is otherwise very robust, only to risk the security of the whole thing on one link that has been machined 3/4 of the way through. I hope that you are right, and that my worries are without merit.
Thanks again.
 
Posts
2,431
Likes
3,312
M
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I suppose that you are right about the spring bar breaking before the link, but I am still surprised that a manufacturer with Omega's reputation for quality would invest so much in the watch, and build a bracelet that is otherwise very robust, only to risk the security of the whole thing on one link that has been machined 3/4 of the way through. I hope that you are right, and that my worries are without merit.
Thanks again.

Have you seen the clasps on older watches? Even thinner than this and just folded metal. Yet some of them have lasted for 50 years. You are overthinking this. If you are truly worried about it snapping, just close the diver’s extension and never open it again. Problem solved, because when it’s closed you won’t be able to get the leverage to break it.
 
Posts
38
Likes
25
M


Have you seen the clasps on older watches? Even thinner than this and just folded metal. Yet some of them have lasted for 50 years. You are overthinking this. If you are truly worried about it snapping, just close the diver’s extension and never open it again. Problem solved, because when it’s closed you won’t be able to get the leverage to break it.

I own the same reference on the OEM bracelet and agree with your post, completely. It would be [nearly] impossible to put enough bending torque on that extension link even when open and when it’s closed, the latching pin fills the void. No worries on this.
 
Posts
4
Likes
7
Thanks to everyone who took the time to reply. Clearly the consensus is that I am worrying unnecessarily. I'll take your advice and just enjoy my watch, and try not to overthink it.

Thanks again,

Kent
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
Just wondering if anyone has heard of, or experienced any problems with bending or weakness in the cutout in the inner link of the diver's extension on the OEM bracelet on the Seamaster 300M?



I purchased my Seamaster in July, and I love it, but I noticed some slight bending where the link in the diver's extension is machined to go around the pin in the two-part link in the extension (please see attached photo).



What troubles me is that there is only perhaps about a millimeter of steel at the bottom of that cutout, and it seems to me that it wouldn't take too much bending or flexing for that to weaken and eventually break, which would result in the watch coming off my wrist (and hitting the ground) at best, and being lost forever at worst. Who knows when or where this might happen? I do not dive, but this watch is my 'daily driver', and I do wear this watch kayaking, and use the diver's extension over my wetsuit. If the bracelet were to break while kayaking there would be almost no chance of ever finding it. To have this weak link on the bracelet of a relatively expensive watch worries me. I suppose I could always purchase the $300.00 OEM Omega rubber strap for my watch, but I like the bracelet and assumed that it would be stronger than the strap. Perhaps not? Anyone else noticed this, or heard of problems?
Thanks!


I just created an account to reply to your thread. I own the exact same watch (1 year old now), and I feel the same way. I only open the extension once or twice per month during cleaning. Today I noticed that this thin part you explain on your thread got bent (about 30 degrees). In order to close the extension I had to straighten the part of the extension back in place. After that it took 5 times trying to open it and close it to make it as straight as possible (as it was). Now it works fine but this thin part looks like a piece of metal that has been bent and straighten.
I feel that this is the weak link of the bracelet and will avoid opening again in the future. Maybe if this happened again this thin part could break. Not enough of a problem to send it the service center yet...
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
I just created an account to reply to your thread. I own the exact same watch (1 year old now), and I feel the same way. I only open the extension once or twice per month during cleaning. Today I noticed that this thin part you explain on your thread got bent (about 30 degrees). In order to close the extension I had to straighten the part of the extension back in place. After that it took 5 times trying to open it and close it to make it as straight as possible (as it was). Now it works fine but this thin part looks like a piece of metal that has been bent and straighten.
I feel that this is the weak link of the bracelet and will avoid opening again in the future. Maybe if this happened again this thin part could break. Not enough of a problem to send it the service center yet...


This watch is not perfect but is still the ultimate diver for me, scoring the highest in my mind compared to the PO, SeaQ, sub etc.
 
Posts
2,473
Likes
4,624
I just created an account to reply to your thread. I own the exact same watch (1 year old now), and I feel the same way. I only open the extension once or twice per month during cleaning. Today I noticed that this thin part you explain on your thread got bent (about 30 degrees). In order to close the extension I had to straighten the part of the extension back in place. After that it took 5 times trying to open it and close it to make it as straight as possible (as it was). Now it works fine but this thin part looks like a piece of metal that has been bent and straighten.
I feel that this is the weak link of the bracelet and will avoid opening again in the future. Maybe if this happened again this thin part could break. Not enough of a problem to send it the service center yet...

Although the Seamaster diver bracelets had a known spring failure issue in the clasp, I've never seen complaints about this particular part. This thread is 2 years dead and a (very) cursory search doesn't yield me any failure with this portion of the extension.

That said... if you do have a legitimate issue, my advice is to take it to an OB and get it assessed.