Forums Latest Members
  1. Peter_from_NL Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    334
    I say yes based on everything being perfectly aligned. What do you say?

    5CFCF736-3B0B-410D-B258-0CCC19DCFB2F.jpeg
     
  2. BlackTalon This Space for Rent Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    5,203
    Likes
    8,431
    Lumed hands but no lume on numbers? Doesn't seem normal based on a brief look through Officer images on Google. Maybe dial was not refinished, but I suspect lume may have been removed and the numbers colored in. Just my relatively uneducated guess, though.
     
    Peter_from_NL and Foo2rama like this.
  3. bgrisso Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    3,141
    Likes
    6,913
    that could be lume on the dial, just gone dark?
     
    Peter_from_NL likes this.
  4. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    2,698
    Likes
    4,639
    This is an original dial. The numerals simply have radium luminous material that has turned to a dark green, which is common. Hands have been re-lumed.
     
    Maskelyne likes this.
  5. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    5,167
    Likes
    8,685
    Your title is strange... This is not a War Watch....model officer. Kind regards. Achim
     
    airansun and UncleBuck like this.
  6. BlackTalon This Space for Rent Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    5,203
    Likes
    8,431
    Maybe, but when I zoom in on the photos there is no build-up of material apparent. Other examples I have seen photos of have thicker build-up (like with lume on Speedmaster plots). Was it typical to apply the lume so thinly?
     
  7. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    3,423
    Likes
    7,765
    Achim, look at the paint build up on the edge of the subdial. Perhaps an old redial that excluded the subdial?
    @Arno (NL), the Officer model doesn't confirm military service and "War watch" is a little off-putting, hope you understand.
     
    Peter_from_NL and watchyouwant like this.
  8. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    5,167
    Likes
    8,685
    Numerals had lume applied.
     
    BlackTalon likes this.
  9. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    2,698
    Likes
    4,639
    The apparent volume of lume does vary but I believe that in this instance, the issue is the photography. Some numerals appear flat but the "9", for example, appears 3-dimensional, to me.
     
    BlackTalon likes this.
  10. redpcar Jul 31, 2020

    Posts
    3,716
    Likes
    8,011
    UV light might help :coffee:
     
    DaveK likes this.
  11. Peter_from_NL Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    334
    I meant the year, 1942. Unclear indeed.
     
    watchyouwant likes this.
  12. Peter_from_NL Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    334
    Thank you all for the comments. I did not realize the radium relationship. I assumed the numbers were just pained from the start. Very interesting information. Perhaps hands not original then. I like it very much though but hesitating. Anybody any idea on a fair value?
     
  13. Maskelyne Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    365
    Likes
    447
    I totally agree with you. Here is a part of the dial on my Officer. You can all see that the radium has turned dark. Radium turns fragile when aging so total or partial loss are very common on these dials.

    Please study tdn-dk excellent thread (great photos as well) for more information regarding the Officer watches.
    https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-officer-and-suverän.15962/

    Omega-Officer-logo.jpg
     
    Edited Aug 1, 2020
    watchyouwant likes this.
  14. tdn-dk Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,552
    I think the lumen have turned dark, here is one of mine

    Omega Officer 1940-41, cal. 26,5 T2, reference 2165.JPG
     
  15. Peter_from_NL Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    334
    Great link. Thanks!!!!

    How bad would the radium be?
     
  16. Peter_from_NL Aug 1, 2020

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    334
    If I compare the numbers of the sub dial with your you see a distinct difference the open “6” for instance. This looks more like “GO”. Wonder whether this is possible or whether the sub dial on my example is indeed an (early?) redial.