keepsonticking
·
I posted a thread two days ago about one of these that I have recently given a new heart and am wearing now. There may already be a thread like this here, but I didn't see one in a quick search. I feel these are watches worth discussing, but for some reason, they are treated like a homecoming queen candidate with a pretty face but who may be carrying a few extra pounds.
I own two of these now but don't wear them much, not because they aren't attractive. I find this to be one of the most aesthetically pleasing chronographs of that era...or now, and they have solid movements. The chrono functions are superior to several others I own. And even the date features on mine are reliable. They keep reasonably good time, too. So why are the prices on them still mostly below 3k, and why are there always half a dozen of them for sale on ebay? At less than 3k, how many great-looking, reliable vintage chronographs with a Val 72 family movement are there to be had? I'm not sure I can think of any. The 72 was good enough for those old Daytonas for a very long time, and one could easily argue that they are not really any better built than the Wakmann.
Is it just the name "Wakmann" that holds them back? It can't be the pretty face. Is there anything that makes it unattractive? Not in my eyes. I look forward to a fulsome and thoughtful discussion and some great photos.
I own two of these now but don't wear them much, not because they aren't attractive. I find this to be one of the most aesthetically pleasing chronographs of that era...or now, and they have solid movements. The chrono functions are superior to several others I own. And even the date features on mine are reliable. They keep reasonably good time, too. So why are the prices on them still mostly below 3k, and why are there always half a dozen of them for sale on ebay? At less than 3k, how many great-looking, reliable vintage chronographs with a Val 72 family movement are there to be had? I'm not sure I can think of any. The 72 was good enough for those old Daytonas for a very long time, and one could easily argue that they are not really any better built than the Wakmann.
Is it just the name "Wakmann" that holds them back? It can't be the pretty face. Is there anything that makes it unattractive? Not in my eyes. I look forward to a fulsome and thoughtful discussion and some great photos.
Edited: