Dr.Sascha
·Hey all,
Looking at this Wakmann Chronograph. The movement (I think it's a Valjoux 72c) is proper grimy, but can be restored. Of greater concern is the hands, which look to be too new for the dial. I've also not found any Wakmanns from that period that have the same style--they tend to be either dauphine (50s) or flat-ended baton. Then again, they do match the subseconds hands and the lollipop sweep-second looks right. Wakmann did a lot of variations in this period.
Thoughts?
Looking at this Wakmann Chronograph. The movement (I think it's a Valjoux 72c) is proper grimy, but can be restored. Of greater concern is the hands, which look to be too new for the dial. I've also not found any Wakmanns from that period that have the same style--they tend to be either dauphine (50s) or flat-ended baton. Then again, they do match the subseconds hands and the lollipop sweep-second looks right. Wakmann did a lot of variations in this period.
Thoughts?