Vintage constellation ID and info help please.

Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
So I was at a St George’s dinner on Sunday and my 146.017 ended up chatting to a vintage Connie.

Turns out the watch was the guys late fathers (so very special to him and never for sale) and it was a drawer find but not in great condition. He paid £300 for a service and it looks to be running ok but I think crystal and crown are replaced. He did not get any info from the caseback or movement from the service or any parts back. Anyway I told him I would post and see if anyone has more info as I am not a Connie aficionado.

Any comments / guesses on the date of manufacture, reference, possible movement, value (only for insurance)
How easy to get a correct crown and any comments on the condition?
We might be able to get someone new into the hobby. His daily is a nice old Seiko diver… so there is hope….

Many thanks for any feedback. I will also let him know about the potential to get an extract and the need to to get the case back and movement info.

Edit/update - Aside from the movements I ended up well-oiled (and fed) on Sunday and one point was lost in translation. I just rang the chap up and when I asked him about a pull/push date set he actually just meant a standard pull out turning crown arrangement (it was incorrect info before this edit)

As an aside why are all my drawer finds just dead spiders and leaky batteries ;0)
Edited:
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
Well, the pull-push date change is the clue here.

With that case style it can only be one of two things - either a replacement movt or, given you quoted a service cost in GB£, more likley a British cased Constellation.
If it is British and as it has (presumably) a 564 movt, it would be around '67 at the earliest - so a late Dennison or Shackman case (Shackman took over Dennison's operations after 1967) with a reference of something like 168.5415.
The conservative British liked this style of case so they kept on producing for around 10 years after the Swiss stopped producing that particular style.
It does have a replacement crown but these are often seen with knurled rather than decagonal crowns - and it's very possible they were supplied like that from new.

Carefully removing the back will tell you all - although that info should have been available when the watch was serviced. (rubber ball would be best - too easy to damage a gold case)

Here is a link to Dennison cases (and a reference to Shackman)
http://omega-constellation-collecto...01/from-advent-of-bretton-woods-monetary.html

British gold-cased Constellations (like the comparable French versions) were of very high quality and have something of a collectors' niche all of their own.

Unfortunately , the watch has been redialled as was common in days of yore but it has been done quite sympathetically and should still be a pleasure to wear and a great memento of his father.
It does hit the value I'm afraid - a good 18k Constellation might privately cost you £3000 but with a redial significantly less - but it should be insured for at least that and more. (it would cost quite a bit more to replace it at retail prices)

An extract probably wouldn't tell you much - most likely to say 'movt supplied to Britain'.


hope that helps
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
Thanks! The Conny seems like a fairly normal one btw, not the desired pie pan models

Tsk tsk mon brave
Many would suggest that no Constellation is 'fairly normal'
And as beauty is in the eye of the beholder -some of us prefer the simpler things in life.

 
Posts
98
Likes
358
Tsk tsk mon brave
Many would suggest that no Constellation is 'fairly normal'
And as beauty is in the eye of the beholder -some of us prefer the simpler things in life.


You're right, I already saw the extended comment above and then I thought: okay, my comment was incorrect. I wanted to post a more ontopic comment so it didn't look like I came purely for that chrono but so that went wrong.

So, i stand corrected.
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
You're right, I already saw the extended comment above and then I thought: okay, my comment was incorrect. I wanted to post a more ontopic comment so it didn't look like I came purely for that chrono but so that went wrong.

So, i stand corrected.

No worries - just gently yanking your chain.

Pie pan constellations do tend to get the majority of plaudits because they are so iconic.
I came to Constellations through a different route and whilst pie pans are great, the simple elegance of dome dials will always be my favoured choice.

Now then, if you're talking pretty gold chronographs, here is a slightly older rose gold version that would sit nicely next to the De Ville above.....

 
Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
Well, the pull-push date change is the clue here.

With that case style it can only be one of two things - either a replacement movt or, given you quoted a service cost in GB£, more likley a British cased Constellation.
If it is British and as it has (presumably) a 564 movt, it would be around '67 at the earliest - so a late Dennison or Shackman case (Shackman took over Dennison's operations after 1967) with a reference of something like 168.5415.
The conservative British liked this style of case so they kept on producing for around 10 years after the Swiss stopped producing that particular style.
It does have a replacement crown but these are often seen with knurled rather than decagonal crowns - and it's very possible they were supplied like that from new.

Carefully removing the back will tell you all - although that info should have been available when the watch was serviced. (rubber ball would be best - too easy to damage a gold case)

Here is a link to Dennison cases (and a reference to Shackman)
http://omega-constellation-collecto...01/from-advent-of-bretton-woods-monetary.html

British gold-cased Constellations (like the comparable French versions) were of very high quality and have something of a collectors' niche all of their own.

Unfortunately , the watch has been redialled as was common in days of yore but it has been done quite sympathetically and should still be a pleasure to wear and a great memento of his father.
It does hit the value I'm afraid - a good 18k Constellation might privately cost you £3000 but with a redial significantly less - but it should be insured for at least that and more. (it would cost quite a bit more to replace it at retail prices)

An extract probably wouldn't tell you much - most likely to say 'movt supplied to Britain'.


hope that helps

That is great information - many thanks. I assume the redial work was a while ago and not part of any recent repairs?. I think he would have mentioned it if he new anything about that. I love the way people some people crack on and get Dads watch repaired without checking all the info. Charming but a shame a chance was missed to get more details.
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
That is great information - many thanks. I assume the redial work was a while ago and not part of any recent repairs?. I think he would have mentioned it if he new anything about that. .

Most likely.
Whoever did the work more or less knew what they were doing.
At first glance it passes the 'MOY test' but the minute haches are too long, the font is too simple with no serifs and the the crossed T in Constellation is an absolute tell tale sign of a redial.
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
@Peemacgee Many thanks again for the input. I think aside from the movements I ended up well-oiled (and fed) on Sunday and one point was lost in translation. I just rang the chap up and when I asked him about a pull/push date set he actually just meant a standard pull out turning crown arrangement. He thinks that watch might be earlier based on his memories. Ref the dial he said he had no information on that but thinks the service and repair work he had done included a crown, crystal and possibly a second hand. I suppose an extract might help with a date but note your point on the English case options. Sorry for the misdirection on the initial post.
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
That's ok
I did have some misgivings about the size of the stars in the medallion - which are usually larger on British cased constellations.
However, the lugs do look slightly longer and narrower than a 14393 (but that could be the angle of the pic) and you would usually find two specific but similar hallmarks on different lugs on a Swiss case - unlike the one seen on one of the lugs in this watch.

Edit pic of rear of my watch removed as shadows made it unhelpful.

Re the movement - You need to ask him how the date is changed.
Can you wind through 12, changing the date, then back through 9 and and through 12 again to change the date again? (often called semi-quickset)
If so, it is a cal 561 and earlier than the 564
If not, he will need to set the hands to 6.30 and (carefully) try pull the crown out beyond the first setting that allows the hands to be moved.
If this changes the date it is a cal 564.
Edited:
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
That's ok
I did have some misgivings about the size of the stars in the medallion - which are usually larger on British cased constellations.
However, the lugs do look slightly longer and narrower than a 14393 (but that could be the angle of the pic) and you would usually find two specific but similar hallmarks on different lugs on a Swiss case - unlike the one seen on one of the lugs in this watch.

Edit pic of rear of my watch removed as shadows made it unhelpful.

Re the movement - You need to ask him how the date is changed.
Can you wind through 12, changing the date, then back through 9 and and through 12 again to change the date again? (often called semi-quickset)
If so, it is a cal 561 and earlier than the 564
If not, he will need to set the hands to 6.30 and (carefully) try pull the crown out beyond the first setting that allows the hands to be moved.
If this changes the date it is a cal 564.

I have messaged him and will report back, thanks
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
Here is a pic of the rear of an 18k 14393, ( from a previous OF thread) that better shows the Swiss hallmarks on two lugs.
 
Posts
12,514
Likes
16,856
Looks like a UK hallmark to me. Here’s blow up from one of the pictures above.



gatorcpa
 
Posts
13,347
Likes
31,468
Is it just me or does OP watch appear to be missing it's bezel?
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,460
Is it just me or does OP watch appear to be missing it's bezel?

Do you know, I hadn't even noticed that but you could well be right.

It should look something like this (courtesy of @Furze from 2016
 
Posts
1,677
Likes
3,453
That De Ville chrono is super cool.
+1 👍
And huzzah for a St George's dinner, @Omegafanman 😝! Perhaps the Burns Night model could be deployed, with Shakespeare's Birthday readings while a fish-and-chips supper is brought in to a rendition of the Beatles behind a model Jules Rimet trophy and under the canopy of a 1:20 scale Lancaster. Or perhaps I too have been well-oiled...
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
+1 👍
And huzzah for a St George's dinner, @Omegafanman 😝! Perhaps the Burns Night model could be deployed, with Shakespeare's Birthday readings while a fish-and-chips supper is brought in to a rendition of the Beatles behind a model Jules Rimet trophy and under the canopy of a 1:20 scale Lancaster. Or perhaps I too have been well-oiled...

All can be arranged…… there was no coffee served after the meal, just a cup of John Harrison GMT…,
.
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
17,503
@Peemacgee
I just sent him a cut and shut list of all the information and questions to consider on an email. Hopefully it keeps his interests and we get some more details. I appreciate all yours and others responses.
Reference the redial I noted that these gold watches tended to come with a gold dial. I assumed a gold dial should normally be more resistant to tarnishing or am I missing something in terms of why it needed that work back in the day?
Thanks