Views on 1940s and later bumpers

Posts
2
Likes
2
Hi all - I'm a newbie, looking for an interesting watch as a 'gift to self' - which I intend to wear regularly - and have sort of become enchanted by the idea of a vintage Omega. I'm still in the early stages of research and trying to narrow down the options.
I've seen quite a few mid-late 1940s bumpers on sale - like this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/176197474479
(I'm using this as an example not a specific watch I'd be interested in buying )
It sort of fits the bill in terms of distinctive and interesting - I know they are small - suits me fine.
They are also relatively cheap. (not most important factor but reduces risk somewhat).

Whats the view of this august community on the practical wearability and future serviceability of this era of watch and bumper movements?

I've seen the 'wind several times during the day' advice and realised that its a bonus for somebody with a fidgeting issue.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
7,641
Likes
26,492
Whats the view of this august community on the practical wearability and future serviceability of this era of watch and bumper movements?

If those considerations are high on your list, why not choose a manual-wind vintage watch? Easier and typically less expensive to service; less can go wrong with the movements; better power reserve capability, etc.
 
Posts
906
Likes
4,345
I’d agree with @Tony C. - the 30T2 manual winders from this period are rock solid and easy to service. I also love the connection one has with the watch with a manual wind movement, keeping it wound and ticking as a little ritual each day. I’m a recent convert to these and I love my 1948 Dennison-cased watch:

 
Posts
8,999
Likes
46,215
Personally, I love the style of the old bumper movement Omegas and the characteristic "thump" that you feel while wearing the watch. I have several including this rather unique 1952 Seamaster 2635 with a honeycomb dial and Breguet numerals:
1729871-acdb5e04bde6e611fe638bc89d33fbee.jpg
That being said, Tony C. and wilderbeast make good points. The old bumper movements are less reliable than both manual winders and rotor based automatics. Parts are becoming harder to find and repairs can be expensive. The above watch is a good example. The movement was badly in need of a service when I bought it and it needed a few parts. The service bill was more than $500 and that, added to the cost of the watch, resulted in me spending more money than the watch is worth. I don't regret it and the watch runs well now and keeps great time, but bumpers can be a bit of a minefield and many watchmakers are shy about working on them.
 
Posts
3,454
Likes
7,941
https://omegaforums.net/threads/wruw-today.567/page-10838#post-2271875
My daily is a bumper as long as forecast is dry.
I have said it often, but the gentle bump makes the watch seem a part of me!

If you want to wear vintage, you will need a relationship with a watchmaker: This choice may affect how you want to go forward.

All the advice is good and very true but it is the bumper for me!
 
Posts
123
Likes
224
If you are set on an omega bumper, I have 7 or 8, look for a caliber 354. It was the last of the bumpers ( 355 is a 354 with date ) and included all the refinements. I recently picked one up off the Private Sales
 
Posts
7,641
Likes
26,492
(I do like bumper movements, and other fans of them might want to note that I will be listing a very nice one FS later today!)

🙄
 
Posts
2
Likes
2
Many thanks for your thoughtful inputs - I dont think it's shut down any options or made the decision any easier.
I'm beginning to see how collections start.....
 
Posts
1,717
Likes
3,539
I would look at ref 2639 from early 50s with movement 265 and later 266 which are descendants of famous 30 line.

Advantages:
They are abundant
Movement reliable and easy to service
Handwind which I like in vintage
Lots of dial options
Larger size 38 mm

I have a nice black gilt dial version (birth year for me 1953) here are some photos and a nice overview article.

https://www.fratellowatches.com/52mondayz-omega-reference-2639/#gref

 
Posts
1,930
Likes
1,181
Bumpers are not efficient winders, so if you have a job where you’re not mobile. It’s not going to wind as well as a full rotor model.

should only have to give a few winds and then wearing the watch will sufficient.

as mentioned. If you want to wind. Buy a manual wind model
 
Posts
20,209
Likes
46,874
I would look at ref 2639 from early 50s with movement 265 and later 266 which are descendants of famous 30 line.

Advantages:
They are abundant
Movement reliable and easy to service
Handwind which I like in vintage
Lots of dial options
Larger size 38 mm

I have a nice black gilt dial version (birth year for me 1953) here are some photos and a nice overview article.

https://www.fratellowatches.com/52mondayz-omega-reference-2639/#gref

~36mm, IIRC. Still a very nice and wearable size.