Forums Latest Members
  1. gnuyork May 1, 2015

    Posts
    298
    Likes
    515
  2. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! May 1, 2015

    Posts
    8,738
    Likes
    69,173
    I see the problem. It was manufactured in Enneib.

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1430513154.701516.jpg
     
  3. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member May 1, 2015

    Posts
    4,418
    Likes
    11,222
    Nope it's real, it's the Pie-Pan for the Japanese market. It's been polished though.
     
  4. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! May 1, 2015

    Posts
    8,738
    Likes
    69,173
    I will sleep well tonight, having learned this one new fact. [emoji3]
     
  5. lenny May 1, 2015

    Posts
    455
    Likes
    942
  6. ulackfocus May 1, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
  7. gnuyork May 1, 2015

    Posts
    298
    Likes
    515
    So the Omega on the bottom is actually correct? Just when I thought I was starting to figure stuff out... it's not April 1st is it?

    But yeah, he says not polished, I didn't believe that for a second.
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 1, 2015

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    Yes, most of the cal. 10XX Constellations (mid to late 1970's) have that configuration. Actually, a few very early 1950's Constellations did as well.

    It's not overly polished. Frankly, there are very few vintage watches have never been polished at all.

    Most watchmakers will polish out scratches on watches they service, unless you specifically request for them no to do so. And then there is the "Oooh, shiny" crowd that like watches with mirror finishes.

    I wouldn't judge a seller too harshly for that one. When the cases start looking like melted ice cubes, then we have a problem.
    gatorcpa
     
    noelekal likes this.
  9. ulackfocus May 1, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    One month too late. You might not have seen the Constellation above the pinion and OMEGA below before because not many vintage collectors chase the 70's 10xx watches. They're correct though. Owned one or two over the years myself.

    He didn't polish it. That's eBay seller semantics.
     
    noelekal likes this.
  10. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 1, 2015

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    I was looking at some eBay listings tonight and came across this:

    [​IMG]

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-OMEGA-CONSTELLATION-CASE-SOLID-GOLD-18K-REF-2648-/231549152588Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    This is the first Constellation reference, a Ref. 2648 from 1952. Despite the poor condition (i.e. missing gold markers, paint loss), this dial is original. MSNWatch has the only other example of this dial I've seen.

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/are-these-dials-correct.18616/#post-201460

    And of course, his is in perfect condition.
    gatorcpa
     
  11. ulackfocus May 1, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Naturally!
     
  12. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant May 1, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    8,675
    that dial has been cleaned and the "expert " ripped out the markers?.....genius ! kind regards. achim
     
  13. gnuyork May 2, 2015

    Posts
    298
    Likes
    515
    I can see that now - being semantics, however description actually says "Watch has never been polished..."

    Whatever. I learned something from this thread, and I am grateful. Too bad the logo is swapped, this is really the Constellation I like, steel with silver piepan and silver indices. Starting to dig arrowheads now too.