Alex H
·Hi, I’m wondering if members would mind sharing their thoughts on these two Omega chronographs please. They are both listed with dealers on the Chrono24 site. The first is US based, selling for £4447 + shipping. The second, Swiss at £6282.
Watch 1. 1947 chronograph. Ref 2466. Cal. 321. 18ct yellow gold. Dealer quoting case is 38mm. Condition quote: good. No box. No papers. £4477. Claiming crown was replaced by Omega, but no logo? Seems odd? Also, there are no images of the movement, but quoting Cal. 321. My thoughts, there is wear and the glass looks in poor condition? Also, from my earlier 1st post here, I was very usefully informed 50% of the watch value is in the face. Thoughts on this one please? Doesn’t look too great to me?
Watch 2. 1950’s chronograph. Ref 2466. 18ct yellow gold. Case size, 38mm. Cal. 321. Condition quote: very good. No box. No papers. £6282. To my inexperienced eye, this timepiece looks in better condition than watch 1 and this is obviously reflected in the price?
Members thoughts would be much appreciated. Many thanks. Alex
Watch 1. First 6 images.
Watch 2. Second 6 images.
Watch 1. 1947 chronograph. Ref 2466. Cal. 321. 18ct yellow gold. Dealer quoting case is 38mm. Condition quote: good. No box. No papers. £4477. Claiming crown was replaced by Omega, but no logo? Seems odd? Also, there are no images of the movement, but quoting Cal. 321. My thoughts, there is wear and the glass looks in poor condition? Also, from my earlier 1st post here, I was very usefully informed 50% of the watch value is in the face. Thoughts on this one please? Doesn’t look too great to me?
Watch 2. 1950’s chronograph. Ref 2466. 18ct yellow gold. Case size, 38mm. Cal. 321. Condition quote: very good. No box. No papers. £6282. To my inexperienced eye, this timepiece looks in better condition than watch 1 and this is obviously reflected in the price?
Members thoughts would be much appreciated. Many thanks. Alex
Watch 1. First 6 images.
Watch 2. Second 6 images.













