That’s a really nice well done redial
I would agree but I cannot unsee some of the really bad numeral spacing
The "1" is sitting a lot higher than the "11", which you can see by the grid in my screenshot.
The 2 is sitting higher than the 10
The 4 is placed much closer to the outer line of the black circle than the 8 and is just about touching the outer line.
The 7 fills the width of the black circle much nicer than the 5, which is closer to one side leaving a gap to the other.
The 1 & 0 of the 10 are much more squished together than the 1 & 1 of the 11.
The 12 is just about touching the outer line of the black circle, the 1 is not, the 2 is, the 3 is not, the 4 is, the 5 is not, the 6 is, the 7 is, and the 8 & 9 are not.
On first glance, the dial looks great but I can't unsee how uneven the spacing on the numerals are.
No way that either of those dials are original.
what about that radiating pattern in the center? Isn’t that difficult to do
I think it is the same watch. There is a white dot just to the right of the 4 in both pictures. The crown doesn't seem to be the original and it would seem to me to be unlikely that two watches have the same crown (unless it was redialed from the same place).
Also, I compared to my TCDD - the font of the numbers for the 13 to the 24 is different.
I think it is a redial with the pictures being of the same watch.
