Tudor black bay pro or Omega seamaster 2254.50

Posts
10,524
Likes
16,448
I love the SMP but bear in mind you are on an Omega forum so naturally there will be a slanted preference in the answers here. One thing as yet unmentioned is that the newest 2254 is now 15 years old, the oldest nearer 25 so finding one in mint condition is more of a challenge than with a newer release. A full service can put a tatty watch mostly back to full health but issues like saggy bracelets or tired clasps can only really be fixed by (expensive) replacement. Also crystals and bezels are getting expensive too. Don’t buy one with issues as fixes are no longer cheap.
 
Posts
3,122
Likes
9,307
Lots of things in favour of 2254.50, except the bezel for me. That thing is so hard to grip. At least with BB Pro you dont have to worry about that

Its called " Turn proof " TM by Omega.
 
Posts
15
Likes
31
Thanks to all for the replies, for me at the end, I prefer to have watches that are in my sights for many years. There is always the urge to buy a new Tudor, or a new Omega, that you see in a shop window when you are waiting in an airport but there are some other watches that you want for ages. I have for years a speedy pro and now a seamaster pro, both watches I wanted to own them for tens of years. So I agree that in the long run it is the correct choice for me, from the point that I like to keep my watches. The BBPro was tempting and frankly a beautiful watch but was released less than a year ago, its proportions are a bit wrong and I find the marketing games of Rolex and Tudor have pushed me away. Regarding the seamaster I absolutely see the point about the impracticality of the bezel but it is an iconic part of the seamaster and matches the curves of the case.
 
Posts
2
Likes
1
I understand the concern about the bezel, but I do find that the only time I have an issue turning it is when it is on the bracelet. If I put it on a nato I have zero issues getting it to turn. Maybe it’s because the nato sits lower in the lugs and your finger tips are able to get more of a purchase without the end links. Just a thought. I will have to replace the bracelet on mine eventually but i usually only wear it on the watch during the colder months. I like a nato in the spring/summer. Congrats on your new to you watch. I love mine and it will not be going any wear. Other watches may come and go, but the 2254 is a keeper. And then eventually it will go to one of my sons.
 
Posts
3,122
Likes
9,307
The bezel is not absolutely "turn proof". It varies with witch strap or bracelet, like Tele5284 said. With the bracelet grip it at twelve and six for best results. Cleaning and lubricating the bezel underside from time to time, will improve turning. Good luck with your new 2254.50!

Letting soapy water soak the underside of the bezel.


Cleaning under the bezel with soapy water and a toothbrush. I carefully use tread also.
 
Posts
7
Likes
1
I don't understand the bezel issue with the 2254.50. It's fine and clicky. I can turn it with one finger just pushing it. Maybe others are gummed up or something. Not sure why it's hard to click for some?
 
Posts
3,122
Likes
9,307
I don't understand the bezel issue with the 2254.50. It's fine and clicky. I can turn it with one finger just pushing it. Maybe others are gummed up or something. Not sure why it's hard to click for some?
One finger!!!!! That spring must be worn out.

Btw are you able to clap with one hand too? 😉
 
Posts
7
Likes
1
One finger!!!!! That spring must be worn out.

Btw are you able to clap with one hand too? 😉
doesn't seem worn to me, just smooth and clicky. if it was worn out, wouldn't it rotate smoothly?
 
Posts
3,122
Likes
9,307
doesn't seem worn to me, just smooth and clicky. if it was worn out, wouldn't it rotate smoothly?
Damn! I need to clean my bezel again. Best I cant do is grip it at 12 and 6 with an iron grip.
 
Posts
18,243
Likes
27,561
2500 42mm PO.

Then again I’m wearing this.

 
Posts
18,243
Likes
27,561
2500 42mm PO.

Then again I’m wearing this.


Ohh this was a weirdly resurrected thread….
 
Posts
1,172
Likes
6,088
I love my 2831.80 and would never sell it, but the Cal. 1120 is a chronometer grade ETA 2892 with a few very nice bells and whistles. The ETA 2892 is a great movement, but a well made in house movement means a lot to me. If GMT is your thing, then the Ref. 2534.50 is worth considering as well. the Omega 1128 is a modified ETA 2892 not a modified ETA 2893. It has the better traveler type GMT that is also in the Tudor MT5652. the Omega 1128 is still essentially a heavily modified 2892. I guess I have a thing for in-house movements. If I am going to fork over that kind of cash for a brand that has the history and reputation of both Omega and Tudor in-house would be my choice. Keep in mind that I have a 2831.80 so my SMP itch has been scratched.

Now the kicker for me is that the Black Bay MT5652 and the Cal 2534.50 Omega 1128 have a feature that my Grand Seiko shares. I love this complication on the Grand Seiko. The Ultra Fine Accuracy chrnonmeter does not need to be reset when I change the hour. The Tudor has he 'flier' complication. This means when you travel, you can "jump" the local hour hand forward or backward in one-hour increments without stopping the watch or affecting the minutes/seconds. That would be a deal maker for me. In your post has inspired me to add the Black Bay Pro to my wish list, but I really am looking for titanium. To the Pegalos FCD GMT is what I'd look at with the smaller MT5652-U with a much thinner case than the MT5652 had.

It seemed that this thread was short on example pics, and I had to scroll a while to see a Tudor. Pictures or it did not happen. Here are examples of my SMP and the Pegalos, and BBP. I'd go with the Back Bay Pro if those were the options.

 
Posts
246
Likes
282
2500 42mm PO.

Then again I’m wearing this.

Best Black Bay. Sorely tempted on a Harrods. It does wear a little thick, mind.