Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
The Harrods one is a Black Bay but not a 58. As the 58 model has become more popular I wouldn’t be shocked if this was the year they finally pulled the plug on the full size Tudor Harrods. But the 58 is a night and day difference as a watch.
What’s not to understand? It’s like saying you don’t understand why some people shop at GAP instead of Banana Republic. Tudor was one of Rolexes many sub-brands aimed at a different market sector. In the case of a Tudor submariner - it’s a Rolex submariner with a different dial and movement (and handset depending on the reference).
Now, movement quality-wise, that’s an interesting conversation. I don’t know my Omega history well enough but when did they switch from a modified ETA to in-house, distinct movements in the SM’s? Tudor also recently made this switch. While Omega is clearly a few years ahead, to me it looks like both are doing the same thing, no?
According to the 100 rules of watch collecting, not watchmaking.
Rule #007: Would James Bond ever wear this brand? If the answer is yes, then it's worth collecting. If no, then it's not.
Examples:
Would James Bond ever wear Rolex ? Yes, he already has
Would James Bond ever wear Omega ? Yes, he currently does
Would James Bond ever wear Patek ? for sure
Would James Bond ever wear Zenith ? he might
Would James Bond ever wear Breitling ? he might
Would James Bond ever wear AP ? for sure
Would James Bond ever wear Tudor ? NEVER !