Rolex Submariner I understand. Tudor Submariner, what's the point ? Might as well get an Omega Seamaster or save for a real Sub. Not trying to offend anyone, but how can Tudor be perceived as a serious standalone brand when all they do is copy Rolex but never try to beat Rolex? At least at Omega they "try" to make better watches than Rolex and in some regards they do. Tudor don't even service the movements of their modern watches, they replace the whole movement at service with a refurbished one. In turn, they will refurbish the movement they removed from your watch, refurbish it, and put it in someone else's watch at service. If Tudor do not preserve the integrity of their watches, collectors should stay away from that brand in my opinion.
Click to expand...