Tudor 2021 releases so popular their website is down

Posts
16,307
Likes
44,926
ETA movements in these, if I've understood things.
Where did they get eta movements? Did Rolex get in line for a Swatchgroup parts account 🙄
 
Posts
261
Likes
179
I think that Tudor Ag925 is made out of Argentium silver. It has very nice properties and is whiter than Sterling Silver. Would love to see it in person. Except that I probably never will as they don't stay in stock for very long for anyone to get a look at it.
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
Where did they get eta movements? Did Rolex get in line for a Swatchgroup parts account 🙄

Oh I have no clue! Though I thought I’d read it somewhere, but might’ve said ETA-based and I probably misread. Way out of my depth. 😁
 
Posts
298
Likes
906
I made the mistake of watching the Tudor promo video. I will never be able to unhear the perky millennial voiceover touting 'weekend-proof' as a USP.

"So chic".

 
Posts
9,961
Likes
47,598
Where did they get eta movements? Did Rolex get in line for a Swatchgroup parts account 🙄
https://www.thewatchcompany.com/blog/a-comprehensive-guide-to-eta-movements/

Yeah it’s interesting. The Tudor 1926 uses a modified ETA. I did a little poking around as that really caught my eye. So the patent expired on several of these ETA’s. Gotta look more into exactly what’s going on with the 1926 as Tudor gave it its own caliber number but apparently it is a modified ETA. I need to double check though as that is what one of the reviews said. That 1926 though gee I think it’s a very nice looking piece. A bit minimalistic but has a quality look to it. I didn’t even know all these watches were being released, I gotta spend less time in the pet thread.
 
Posts
298
Likes
906
Just read a blog comment that referred to the new Panda chono as the Baytona.

Chuckle.
 
Posts
16,748
Likes
47,395
Just read a blog comment that referred to the new Panda chono as the Baytona.

Chuckle.

Heard it called Speedmasteresque in design.

“Then instantly stopped listening to the rubbish gibberish”
 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,423
I'd like some of these more - chrono, guilloche dial, if they'd left off the date complication.

For Tudor, excepting perhaps one or two versions of the Black Bay, vintage still rules.

 
Posts
986
Likes
3,007
https://www.thewatchcompany.com/blog/a-comprehensive-guide-to-eta-movements/

Yeah it’s interesting. The Tudor 1926 uses a modified ETA. I did a little poking around as that really caught my eye. So the patent expired on several of these ETA’s. Gotta look more into exactly what’s going on with the 1926 as Tudor gave it its own caliber number but apparently it is a modified ETA. I need to double check though as that is what one of the reviews said. That 1926 though gee I think it’s a very nice looking piece. A bit minimalistic but has a quality look to it. I didn’t even know all these watches were being released, I gotta spend less time in the pet thread.

Tudor website says 'Calibre T601' so it is Sellita.
  • T201 (ETA 2671 base)
  • T601 (Sellita 2824 base)
  • T603 (Sellita 2834 base)
 
Posts
585
Likes
1,220
I made the mistake of watching the Tudor promo video. I will never be able to unhear the perky millennial voiceover touting 'weekend-proof' as a USP.

"So chic".


The new releases seem pretty cool, but the video is really cringeworthy, from the actor's voice to the words they chose to use
 
Posts
9,961
Likes
47,598
Tudor website says 'Calibre T601' so it is Sellita.
  • T201 (ETA 2671 base)
  • T601 (Sellita 2824 base)
  • T603 (Sellita 2834 base)
Thanks
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
Went hands-on today with the new 2021 Black Bay Fifty-Eight 925

https://www.tudorwatch.com/en/watches/black-bay-fifty-eight/m79010sg-0001

All photos are unprocessed, straight out of my iPhone, with only cropping and some smudging for the QR code and serial number.

Tudor is apparently staying tight lipped about the specific alloys being used, but claimed in their sales training to the ADs that the case "will not tarnish".

As an amateur gold and silversmith for 20+ years (though not a metallurgist) I'm thoroughly disinclined to believe this statement, and the sales guys were super cool when we bantered about that, saying essentially, "well, that's what they're telling us". Frankly, tarnish would be a totally interesting thing, IMO, and would really only happen on surfaces that are not routinely touched or are touchable, like in the bezel ridges, between the lugs, etc. So to me personally the notion of tarnish is a non-issue. The only worry I'd have with silver is its softness and how it will stand up to abuse of daily wear. Will it be a ding-magnet? Don't know of course.

The watch has decent heft, though not what you'll get in the 18k, which this AD didn't have in stock yet.

Overall, as soon as he laid it on the pad, it exuded a kind of charm and warmth that I think silver has. While it's a white metal, it's clear in person that it's neither steel nor titanium.

The taupe color of the dial and bezel is gorgeous in real life too. I think it goes perfectly with the warmth of the silver, and I especially like that the bezel really changes shade on various angles.

The lume in several of my shots is way over-exposed. The impression I got was of it being a clear step down from a stark white, but definitely not anything that made me think "fauxtina" the way you see with my own BB58, sitting alongside.

The leather strap has some kind of synthetic liner on the bottom side that he told me is there to prevent sweat from prematurely affecting the leather. Don't think I love that choice so much. Buckle is made of the same silver alloy as the case.

I swooned, I can't deny it. It's a total stunner in real life. It's one that I am seriously meditating on, and one that I know will be gone by the weekend -- which will be a relief! -- but getting a first-dibs opportunity to see and be able to buy, I feel privileged and very grateful to my AD for that.

NOTE: I have a short video clip of the display back, which I might post and link to. Personally, while it's interesting that Tudor put a display back, it's not a movement actually worthy of looking at, IMO.

 
Posts
261
Likes
179
Thanks for the photos. First, does the watch weigh heavier or lighter than the regular SS 58? Also, from your photos the taupe color doesn’t seem to have enough contrast? Makes it difficult to read. Is that true with the naked eye as well?
Edited:
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
Thanks for the photos. First, does the watch weight heavier or lighter than the regular SS 58? Also, from your photos the taupe color doesn’t seem to have enough contrast? Makes it difficult to read. Is that true with the naked eye as well?

I didn't do a one-in-each-hand side by side weight comparison, so going by memory alone (and maybe Tudor has published the data online) but it seemed a bit heavier than my steel BB 58. The weight didn't seem problematic though.

Legibility looked good, and I have quite bad eyesight, btw. Not as much contrast as with my BB 58, but I didn't have any concerns about how it would read at a quick glance.

The lighting here was harsh and very bright, and the taupe, when shaded, goes quite a bit darker, as I recall.
 
Posts
261
Likes
179
I didn't do a one-in-each-hand side by side weight comparison, so going by memory alone (and maybe Tudor has published the data online) but it seemed a bit heavier than my steel BB 58. The weight didn't seem problematic though.

Legibility looked good, and I have quite bad eyesight, btw. Not as much contrast as with my BB 58, but I didn't have any concerns about how it would read at a quick glance.

The lighting here was harsh and very bright, and the taupe, when shaded, goes quite a bit darker, as I recall.
Thanks, I hope I get a chance to see one in person as well.
 
Posts
9,961
Likes
47,598
I already see 1926 being flipped on Reddit, didn’t take long. Had a bracelet and strap for 2300
 
Posts
67
Likes
261
New 2021 Black Bay Fifty-Eight 925, I like it....I do wish it had the bracelet as an option....and would like to see what it looks like with a bracelet on it.