rkman11
·I would throw it in the trash
Yup, first thing to do with a Vostok after opening the box is pry off the tin bracelet and toss it. Then enjoy a great quirky watch that you can beat the heck out of for less than $100!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I would throw it in the trash
Wow. Seiko running away with it.
My vote is for Hamilton. Looks like IWC and feels solid. Everyone wears a diver. I say get a field watch. Much more stylish.
But I can trust swimming with it with a 50m water resistance and I am weary paying over 220. They say don't swim with 30m so does 50m suffice?
But I can trust swimming with it with a 50m water resistance and I am weary paying over 220. They say don't swim with 30m so does 50m suffice?
I think “technically” you can swim with 50m water resistance, but I wouldn’t. Since I own the Hamilton I can tell you, while the crown snaps tight to the case after adjusting, it doesn’t feel locked in. I wouldn’t swim with anything that doesn’t have a screw down crown.
That is part of what I want. The current beater I have is quartz and I can't describe it but I don't like wearing quartz for everything, I want something with a weight to it. By beater I am mean everyday everything wear(excluding hammers and such).
We're not doing this water resistance stuff again, are we? Archer has covered this several times, including updating the information in this thread:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/horology-101-waterproofing.77470/

Apparently we are![]()
I have heard people claim that they can swim with their Snks on a regular basis. So opinion varies. From the base stats I understand.
Yeah, opinion varies, but not the facts.
I have a Titanium 200M Citizen Chronograph that doesn't have a screw down crown. I'd have no worries about swimming with it If my watchmaker tests the WR and it passes, despite the lack of screw down crown. But there are still some people here who would feel unsafe swimming with it.
Where do you draw the line?