Thoughts on what Speedy I could have here?

Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
The case back apparently says 145.012 67SP (waiting for confirmation pics) but the movement serial says 20mil (it isn't that clear to my eyes) which I would have thought is placing the movement closer to 1963 possibly making it a ST105.003 or ST105.012

Looks heavily polished - interested in your views on that and the condition in general.

Appreciate any thoughts on what I have here if the case back . The seller is asking USD11k

Walk tentatively closer or run away 😁👎


 
Posts
2,421
Likes
4,670
A 26xx would makes it plausible for a 145.012, a 20xx rather not 😀 Are you sure it's a 20?
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
A 26xx would makes it plausible for a 145.012, a 20xx rather not 😀 Are you sure it's a 20?

Not 100% Just looks like it from this photo - possibly the seller has sent an incorrect movement photo. Let me look into that.

quick update: The seller says that is the correct movement photo though he will confirm and send pics of the serial and case back - but he also states it is a 20m serial.
 
Posts
2,421
Likes
4,670
Not 100% Just looks like it from this photo - possibly the seller has sent an incorrect movement photo. Let me look into that.

quick update: The seller says that is the correct movement photo though he will confirm and send pics of the serial and case back - but he also states it is a 20m serial.

a 20xx serial with a asymmetrical clutch bridge is would mean the bridge was swapped, the serial is wrong or both. So it would neither be a movement for a 105. nor a 145.012.
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
a 20xx serial with a asymmetrical clutch bridge is would mean the bridge was swapped, the serial is wrong or both. So it would neither be a movement for a 105. nor a 145.012.

regarding the progression of the 321 "Generation 1 (1957-1963), Transitional (1963-64) and Generation 2 (1964 -1969). A Generation 2 movement is immediately distinguished by its non symmetrical clutch bridge while Gen 1 and Transitional movements both feature symmetrical bridges. "
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
“SWIS S”

Looking at the right T between 28.0 and 28.2 seconds - 1966 - 69 dial?
 
Posts
5,270
Likes
24,055
Check the different colour of the number bridge and the other copper bridges/plates
 
Posts
44
Likes
96
To me the first caracter in the serial number looks like an 'R' not a '2'. The R serials were - as far as I know - pre-production or replacement movements. The significant colour difference, as Spacefruit points out, indicates (at least to me) that the number bridge does not match to the rest of the movement. I would run away!
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
To me the first caracter in the serial number looks like an 'R' not a '2'. The R serials were - as far as I know - pre-production or replacement movements. The significant colour difference, as Spacefruit points out, indicates (at least to me) that the number bridge does not match to the rest of the movement. I would run away!

yep, quickly shuffling away not walking. 👍
Edited:
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
8,554
I never knew R serials existed until now and though it looked like an R on the serial, I was thinking it must just be my old eyes.

This is what is great about ΩF, always something to learn aside of just reinforcing my own conformational biases. 😁

Thanks to all. 👍
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,764
a 20xx serial with a asymmetrical clutch bridge is would mean the bridge was swapped, the serial is wrong or both. So it would neither be a movement for a 105. nor a 145.012.

From my experience, the asymmetrical bridge is correct north of 20 million. For example, reference105.002-62 straddle the 20 million line. Movement numbers 1952xxxx and 1983xxxx should have symmetrical bridges while the later movement numbers of 2052xxxx do not. That being said, I can’t recall seeing any Speedmaster with movement number near 2007xxxx,
 
Posts
9,866
Likes
15,505
I don’t think it is an R serial, those I have seen have fewer digits. That is a Franken or bitsa watch.