Forums Latest Members
  1. gbesq Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    7,937
    Likes
    40,524
    369B0A42-F64B-434A-A8B6-5E596851D374.jpeg The serial number equates to a manufacturing date in the 1984 timeframe. To my untrained eye, the dial and bezel look correct for the reference, but I’m wondering about the hands. The lume on the hands appears pretty consistent with the tritium dial indices, but the hands still look pretty bright to me for a 35 year old watch. Luminova service replacements? All thoughts appreciated. Thanks.
     
  2. BDHD Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    335
    Likes
    1,006
    Hello gbesq!

    In my opinion those hands were replaced and are not original to the watch.

    Thanks
     
  3. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    2,583
    Likes
    14,045
    I vote for replacement hands also. Dial also with no hint of patina
     
  4. gbesq Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    7,937
    Likes
    40,524
    Thank you, gentlemen. Much appreciated.
     
  5. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    2,583
    Likes
    14,045
    It all depends on if you like it and the price of course
     
  6. gbesq Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    7,937
    Likes
    40,524
    Yes, of course, but I’ll have to factor in the cost of swapping out service parts for ones that are correct for the reference.
     
  7. Eve Nov 7, 2019

    Posts
    1,498
    Likes
    4,929
    I think it could look nicer in natural light than on this photo. Do you have any other photos? Movement shot? Whats the asking price?