Forums Latest Members
  1. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
    I couldn't find a previous discussion post on this eBay offering - but I may have missed it so let me know.

    Not looking at buying, but does it look correct?

    The lugs look polished from the pics and what of the lume?

    Serial just inside the known ranges. Seamaster swapped hands (look long enough) or looking correct including the correct sweep for B4 variant.

    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/AUTHENTIC-RARE-OMEGA-SPEEDMASTER-CAL-321-REF-2998-62-OM-280518/273240831591?hash=item3f9e6c3667:g:DtQAAOSwc~5bC3sD

    Screen Shot 2018-05-31 at 4.43.57 PM.jpg

    ::popcorn::
     
    Edited May 31, 2018
  2. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    PeterMizzi likes this.
  3. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    I don't usually look at Ebay much but noticed that this afternoon. Price didn't seem outlandish at US$18.5K considering what is being asked for others.
     
  4. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    You forgot something John.


    s-l1600.jpg s-l1600 (1).jpg s-l1600 (3).jpg s-l1600 (2).jpg s-l1600 (4).jpg s-l1600 (5).jpg
     
    blubarb likes this.
  5. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    The dial looks like it has a slightly mottled effect which I think looks quite attractive.
     
  6. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
    Thanks, mate. :thumbsup: I was curious as to the case back inscription.
     
  7. kov Trüffelschwein. May 31, 2018

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    I saw it earlier today and was thinking that movement looks like those from the earlier references. Strange for a -62 isn't it? [​IMG]
     
    PeterMizzi likes this.
  8. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
    Interesting location: the Law Courts, Australia - hmmmm? :D In the watch house?
     
    PeterMizzi likes this.
  9. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    blubarb likes this.
  10. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
    MWO shows known serials to be 18.419.xxx - 19.584.xxx (p.262)
     
  11. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    Go on, you know you want to.
     
    Spacefruit and blubarb like this.
  12. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
  13. blubarb May 31, 2018

    Posts
    3,595
    Likes
    8,113
    Or as Del Boy on the British UK sit com Only Fools and Horses says "Go on...you know it makes sense"

    Screen Shot 2018-05-31 at 5.12.40 PM.jpg
     
  14. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    I thought someone would have put a bid in by now.
     
  15. PeterMizzi May 31, 2018

    Posts
    36
    Likes
    85
    It's a shame the seller has so much negative feedback and that he has used a fictional location, I think these 2 factors alone are what's holding the bids back.
     
    blubarb likes this.
  16. Tubber May 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    Does look pretty dismal.
     
  17. rcs914 May 31, 2018

    Posts
    2,502
    Likes
    3,593
    wsfarrell likes this.
  18. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder May 31, 2018

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    1-s-l1600.jpg

    This dial is showing a lot of lifting paint, bubbling. It is an unusual, but not unheard of symptom in an old dial.
    The dial plot lume is even, thick, and attractively coloured, and shows no relation (in terms of deterioration, I ignore colour) to the hands lume.

    So I am calling a re lume on that one.

    I would even go so far as wanting to take the dial off and check the back of it, to make sure it is an old dial not a heated service dial.
     
    blubarb and bazamu like this.
  19. neilfrancis May 31, 2018

    Posts
    586
    Likes
    1,498
    Is that a step dial?? Should be, shouldn't it? But is it?
     
  20. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia May 31, 2018

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Am I the only one who thinks the movement number engraving looks suspect?
    C10F8533-C9CA-4C39-A2C9-054EC6D39D3F.jpeg
     
    Edited May 31, 2018
    blubarb, eugeneandresson, kov and 2 others like this.