cvalue13
·I feel the same way about CNN.
Does that make Bob’s Watches editorial MSNBC?
I feel the same way about CNN.
Does that make Bob’s Watches editorial MSNBC?
I have noticed that they are quite sensitive to any insinuation that their "editorial" (used with some discretion) and web retail businesses are absolutely fire walled. I tend to think they doth protest too much, in that regard, as I see the responses on Instagram and twitter.
I have a truly conflicted relationship with the site. I read it far too frequently for my own comfort. Some writers are better than others. Some articles are better composed than others. One writer in particular has a specific proclivity for overly trite phrases and "cuteness," and I admit to reading his pieces to only feed my own distaste.
None of these blogs are proper "journalism" in the "writing of news" sense. They are written for enthusiasts, to promote and sell watches. It's marketing rather than news.
For example, nobody's been able to say for sure what is going on with Rolex supply. If the equivalent was happening at Apple or any of hundreds of other global companies there'd be any number of investigations or even books on the topic, but all we get is a ton of posts about what a salesman at an AD told somebody that asked about a Daytona.
Exactly what I was thinking as I started to read your post.
Do you think Hodinkee would dare to ask to hard questions of Rolex?. I think not, too risky to their advertising revenue.
Do you think Hodinkee would dare to ask to hard questions of Rolex?. I think not, too risky to their advertising revenue.
Actually that is quite interesting because I once found an on line interview with Ben Clymer where he addressed the point that his magazine used to be a scrappy blog for enthusiasts and they’re now essentially catering to a wealthier audience, and his reply was in substance, if your business it to talk about pieces of men’s jewelery which are both expensive and inessential, you cannot survive as a business if you don’t cater to the wealthy.
I was actually impressed how straightforward he was about it, and I thought «okay, fair enough».
Surely that's worse though, no? Someone with a demonstrated ability to string together words into coherent sentences with both style AND quality but actively chooses to do neither.
Ben Clymer has similarly impressed me in certain interviews or podcasts. As I understand it, he didn’t come from much, was in journalism school, and began blogging about watches on the side; my details are surely off, but that’s the general picture. A ‘scrappy’ character who took a not insignificant risk, and devoted considerable effort, in turning his professional endeavors toward his love of watches. I find it hard to fault such a character. (He’s certainly not “a banker” as someone above implied.)
Except she was hit by a T-shirt from a T-shirt cannon.
He went to journalism school on the side from his job at UBS on Wall Street.
I don't know what his background is, but he certainly came from something - people who don't come from much don't get Speedmasters from their grandfathers.