- Posts
- 81
- Likes
- 68
Thinking about expanding my collection....
- Posts
- 13,477
- Likes
- 31,752
X350 XJR
··Vintage Omega AficionadoA nice 50s/60s Constellation.
- Posts
- 586
- Likes
- 749
Capt Cave Man
·Would agree on a Constellation or a Seamaster 120 to complete the set.
- Posts
- 602
- Likes
- 548
MCC
·Cal 321 Speedy if your pockets can stand it !
- Posts
- 81
- Likes
- 68
- Posts
- 295
- Likes
- 148
- Posts
- 295
- Likes
- 148
- Posts
- 463
- Likes
- 459
- Posts
- 81
- Likes
- 68
Callaway
·I am really interested in a 1966 ( since its my birth year)
- Posts
- 602
- Likes
- 548
- Posts
- 123
- Likes
- 543
- Posts
- 3,817
- Likes
- 16,152
Fritz
·A Connie or a 30T2
- Posts
- 910
- Likes
- 1,053
durri70
·A time only chronometer from 40/50’s
- Posts
- 3,797
- Likes
- 10,383
Waltesefalcon
·Constellation.
- Posts
- 315
- Likes
- 781
Evose
·Can’t wait to see the 321 but that price tag, 14k.
- Posts
- 901
- Likes
- 4,167
lindo
·You need a late 50s/early 60s Constellation to round out that collection.
- Posts
- 335
- Likes
- 144
Dr.K
·Yes Connie. Maybe a Moonwatch. 😀
- Posts
- 81
- Likes
- 68
Callaway
·Thanks for your input. I think a speedmaster -66 is what i want. Maybe the SM 300 will have to go to finance it
- Posts
- 295
- Likes
- 148
- Posts
- 16,307
- Likes
- 44,983
JwRosenthal
·+1 for Moonwatch
Those of us born after ‘69 (‘72 for me) are much luckier than you pre ‘70’ers - our birthyear watches are far less expensive.
But don’t sell the MKII, that’s a cool watch
Those of us born after ‘69 (‘72 for me) are much luckier than you pre ‘70’ers - our birthyear watches are far less expensive.
But don’t sell the MKII, that’s a cool watch
Similar threads
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 430
- Posts
- 26
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 168
- Posts
- 8
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 10
- Views
- 1K
