Mark020
··not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawerThis 22537 was sold today (or not). Highest bid of USD 2.300 (excl. 30%) https://www.invaluable.com/auction-...rod&queryID=af46c7eb1b229e45e8fbb20ab7743b61#
This lot sold yesterday for USD 1.300 (https://jones-horan.hibid.com/lot/138825303/assorted-ww-chronograph-parts-lot?q=universal+geneve). Ref 22285 - so 32mm - with matching movement. Most (important) parts seem to be there and from the estate of a watchmaker. I stepped out at USD 1.000. Nice project but too risky for me above that price (and I will have to pay another USD 300-400 in shipping and taxes alone)
This 22537 was sold today (or not). Highest bid of USD 2.300 (excl. 30%) https://www.invaluable.com/auction-...rod&queryID=af46c7eb1b229e45e8fbb20ab7743b61#
Hello Ben,
Just a speculation - on this particular watch (Compur ref 22223) couldn’t the “Swiss made” have been added later? The dial looks all nice and original, but the reference and serial number would normally (probably) imply a dial without “Swiss” on it.... (??)
The “Swiss made” has a strange serif font and kind of does not fit the radius of the other printing well...
Similarly for the “rolex caseback” Compur 22208 you posted earlier - it’s a serial and dial design I would expect to have no markings...
Do we know in what year (serial) UG started to put “Swiss” consistently on the chrono dials?
Re: 2&3 handers - I know nothing of them, wouldn’t dare to judge them, sorry.
Btw. This “Swiss made” debate would merit a proper thread... 😉
Idiots.
Nice 12495 (although the dial has some funky parts...): https://www.ebay.fr/itm/404182413632
Dial seems ok to me… what I don’t understand is why the seller calls it a “Hermes” dial? 😕