The Smiths That Never Was: Britain's Lost Military Diver

Posts
8
Likes
13
Dear All

We are proud to announce that our article, "The Smiths That Never Was: Britain's Lost Military Diver", has been published in Timepiece, the magazine of the
British Watch & Clock Makers Guild (BWCMG).

Smiths-P1-Proof-10-Image-Copy-for-MC-scaled.jpg
The article, which has been granted front-page status, explores our discovery and subsequent investigation of the remarkable Smiths W10/0308 wristwatch we unveiled last year.


Our research includes an evaluation of the watch’s provenance and construction, together with other known Smiths experimental military wristwatches and newly examined MoD documents relating to secret trials of British military dive watches.

The Guild considers our article to be "an important record of an important watch, which will now be preserved in history".

It is the culmination of many months of hard work and tireless research. However, as genuine military watch enthusiasts, researching a timepiece of such potentially huge historical significance has been a true labour of love, and an absolute dream come true.

When we acquired the watch, we knew it was special, but we did not appreciate quite how significant it may prove to be. The deeper we looked, the more difficult it became to explain it as anything other than an experimental military prototype.

When considering its provenance, construction and the wider historical context, the evidence supports a compelling possibility: that Smiths came remarkably close to producing a fully British military dive watch to rival its Swiss-made contemporaries.

James Bond famously wore a Rolex, but had the newly researched Smiths been produced, perhaps he would have checked the time on a watch not made in Geneva but in Cheltenham.


The Smiths W10/0308 and our article are to feature on The Grey NATO podcast this forthcoming Thursday.

In the meantime, the full story can be found within our latest journal, The Smiths That Never Was: Britain's Lost Military Diver.

I sincerely hope you enjoy it.

Our sincere thanks and appreciation go to the following for their kind assistance in the preparation of our article: Konrad Knirim, Barry M Jones, Simon Freese, Jonathan Hughes, Simon Farrow, Harper Field Auctioneers & The British Watch & Clock Makers Guild.

Chris Herbert MBWCG


Finest Hour
www.finest-hour.co.uk
 
Posts
1,848
Likes
3,597
Interesting watch and thanks for posting this article.
Instead of drilled lugs for male spring bars, or fixed bars, this watch takes female spring bars ? which is the weaker option i believe. if Any successors of the Smiths brand want to take this up and add a bezel with markings you will have a nice watch. Maybe Fears as they already produce a similair ( Majetek ) case style ?
 
Posts
8
Likes
13
Interesting watch and thanks for posting this article.
Instead of drilled lugs for male spring bars, or fixed bars, this watch takes female spring bars ? which is the weaker option i believe. if Any successors of the Smiths brand want to take this up and add a bezel with markings you will have a nice watch. Maybe Fears as they already produce a similair ( Majetek ) case style ?
Thank you so much. Happily, such a project is already in the works. Please be sure to sign up for new stock alerts on our website to find out more!
 
Posts
795
Likes
1,456
The article has generated some commentary on MWR forums, as one might expect. I think it would be fair to characterize the consensus there as skeptical.
 
Posts
8
Likes
13
Thank you for your message.
It is usual for a new discovery to attract a certain degree of skepticism.
We are happy with our research, and we encourage anyone interested to carefully study our article so they may draw their own conclusions in a calm, rational manner.
The article has generated some commentary on MWR forums, as one might expect. I think it would be fair to characterize the consensus there as skeptical.