The "short question - short answer " - box

Posts
3,078
Likes
6,392
Hi at OF and welcome in 2024 馃憤

Maybe this "box" can be useful for all ... I hope so.

Let me start to ask

All watches with "chronometer / chronometre" printed on the dial: these watches (the movements) have a COSC-certificate.

YES / NO?
 
Posts
6,299
Likes
30,747
It gets even more complicated as I have 2 watches without chronometer on the dial but are COSC certified.
 
Posts
13,811
Likes
53,828
No
 
Posts
3,078
Likes
6,392
I found a Speedmaster 3594.50.00 broad arrow from 1985 # 4.83x.xxx
Which sort of lume is used? I found on www that it is non tritium.
True?
 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
I found a Speedmaster 3594.50.00 broad arrow from 1985 # 4.83x.xxx
Which sort of lume is used? I found on www that it is non tritium.
True?
False. Next!
 
Posts
3,078
Likes
6,392
OK, that confirms speedmaster101 Tritium until 1992

so he s telling b+++ sh++

 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
OK, that confirms speedmaster101 Tritium until 1992
Tritium until 1997 in fact.
 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
I think you have misunderstood him. That model, known previously as the Replica was current from around 1997-2000 so was one of the first to get a SL lume dial, I dont see where he says its from the 80s. I. can't quite recall if there was a tritium dial Replica but I don't think there was.
 
Posts
3,078
Likes
6,392
Tritium until 1997 in fact.
seamaster101:

(Note as of 2023 - I am seeing increased interest in all Tritium Speedmasters, up to the change to Superluminova in 1992)
 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
I didn't see the serial mentioned but if it is indeed 48.3m as you suggest, that dates to around 1996/1997.

See:https://www.ilovemyspeedmaster.com/productiondateprediction/

I haven't noticed that on Williams's site (which is of course Speedmaster101) but if it is a direct quote then I can only suggest it is a typo or error. There was no SL used until 1997.

You set this thread up for short answers, you are making me break the rules!!!

EDIT: We could ask William for a comment I guess, though I think he'd be the first to say he has little interest in Speedies post the tritium era @Spacefruit
Edited:
 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
Most if not all online lists have issues, particularly with anything after 1990 or so. Speedmasters run in different number sequences to other Omega models. These days pretty much all Omegas do and the lists are useless.
 
Posts
3,078
Likes
6,392
OK . understood. (So he listed this model as 1984) Thank you!

But what about 1997 you mentioned ?
 
Posts
10,674
Likes
16,641
What does the 1 stand for?

It鈥檚 to do with hand height. You see it on models with applied indices.