snake.doctor
路Maybe it's time to pick up an actual Speedie with the 1861...
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Why? He does an excellent job and stocked up on likely parts for regular customers before dropping the account. I never said I was dissatisfied with him, just Omega's choices.
Speedmasters aren't a subject of acquisitive interest for me.
I just worry about the serviceability of these watches down the line. Even the 861 has parts available from non-Omega sources since it existed long before the parts lockdown. I understand Swatch thinks this is the path to long term viability, but they also may put the final nail in the coffin of the independent watchmaker and competition in the repair marketplace.
... genius! 馃榾30 years from now Omega will come out with an 1861 "re-edition" and we'll all go crazy for it... genius! 馃榾
My enthusiasm for "new" is always tempered by the disturbing fact that so often there are bugs to get worked out, and they don't get worked out in house...they get worked out on you. And this is with watches, cars, drugs - the list is nearly endless.
A lot of people seems to be really excited about the new movement. To some extent I can see why, but the other half of me is not so sure. Here we have the 1861/861 movement (the differences are subtle) that have been in service since 1969. It has been in space and was retested by NASA for the shuttle missions. I cant see past the fact that the Moonwatch now moves away from the great thing that it was. The new movement, though great, makes the Speedmaster a modern watch and far from the one being used in space. Of course you could say that it is still the same movement with some updates, but I'm not sure what to think here. The fact that the Moonwatch was unchanged for so many years was a big sellingpoint for me. Now it is a modern Omega,,