- Posts
- 83
- Likes
- 151
Gamma
·If there’s money to be made it’s amazing the lengths people will go to.....
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Newer version….
Which seller? I hardly check out rolexforums 🙁
You don’t have to look that far….
Of course I don't want to start any witch hunting but here some pictures of some well known and reputable American dealers: from these pictures is impossible to tell, the only way is the UV check.
The davidoff brothers aren't located in the USA. Do you have any experience dealing with them personally? If not perhaps including a picture of a watch they are offering with the caveat "not to start any witch hunting"--but heres a picture isnt the best way to go about it. My transaction with them was extremely positive and I think they do the speedmaster collecting community a great service with the information they provide.
On the other hand I have dealt with Fog City. Can not comment on the legitimacy of the watches they offer but can say, unequivocally, that Tim's customer service was HORRIBLE.
Common sense goes a long way. I doubt every single vintage Rolex or Speedmaster offered by Roy/Sacha, for example, would be perfectly patinated, with perfect case and if it comes with Papers, all matching booklets etc. to the tee. Same could be said about Curtis and Adam mentioned above. What raises suspicion is the continuous inventory of perfect examples.
For the most part, reputable sellers that have brick and mortar store front, will come clean if dial or hands have been altered/relumed. Also, if you have handled enough examples, you know exactly what to look for, which years are prone to strong patina on certain references.
The evidence is in front of us, just need to know what to look for.
When it comes to 5 digit patina, the one from 89-91 usually have the strongest patina, and many WILL NOT have matching hands.
When I see matching hands that is usually an indication of color matched.
Rarely will you see heavy custard outside of the range, although earlier do have it.
Everyone has to remember one thing...Ricky down in Florida, who is a classically trained ballet dancer, can make 1:1 inserts from scratch, relume, laser weld, recut...you name it. All of his work is on the up and up and he doesn't deceive.
So if a classically trained ballet dancer, with little formal training can do this amazing work, what in the hell can someone with training whose goal is to deceive...what can they do?
I'll tell you...they can relacquer a gilt dial with original lume to make it a mirror...they can relacquer a gilt dial and relume with radium (we all know that shit show that I uncovered last year), they can laser weld, recut, and age...they can create a case from scratch, cut serial numbers, and create fake papers.
They can do and DO IT ALL...everyday.
When it comes to VR, you have to know the game, the players, the rules (or lack there of), and how the game is played. It's money ball now and everyone is out for themselves.
Good luck with it...you'll need it.
I agree that it's more common to find lighter patina on five digits watches and that over exposed / color adjusted pictures may be tricky or suspicious.
That said I think that luckily it's always possible to verify if a 90's watch was relumed or messed up, with the help of a UV light (whereas for example is harder on earlier watches because 70's lume is now dead).
In fact 90's lume still have to react if stimulated with UV: it reacts "whitish " when you point the light and glows for a few seconds after you turn it off.
The uniformity and intensity of the glow may change, but you should always find some shimmering: and this doesn't happen on relumed watches.
While you may find some difference between hands and indexes in terms of glow (and colors) because of the different suppliers, you will always find this whitish and glowing on original lume (at least on indexes) while relumed /repainted are dead.
Of course I don't want to start any witch hunting but here some pictures of some well known and reputable American dealers: from these pictures is impossible to tell, the only way is the UV check.
A different kettle of fish are all the "cream" Daytona / Explorer and the Patrizzi 16250: while the 90's lume is in general starting to develop stronger patina, imo those dials can't change colors with time, cream Daytona and Explorer had a flaw in painting that showed immediately, and UV can't help to see if they were messed up.
I agree that it's more common to find lighter patina on five digits watches and that over exposed / color adjusted pictures may be tricky or suspicious.
That said I think that luckily it's always possible to verify if a 90's watch was relumed or messed up, with the help of a UV light (whereas for example is harder on earlier watches because 70's lume is now dead).
In fact 90's lume still have to react if stimulated with UV: it reacts "whitish " when you point the light and glows for a few seconds after you turn it off.
The uniformity and intensity of the glow may change, but you should always find some shimmering: and this doesn't happen on relumed watches.
While you may find some difference between hands and indexes in terms of glow (and colors) because of the different suppliers, you will always find this whitish and glowing on original lume (at least on indexes) while relumed /repainted are dead.
Of course I don't want to start any witch hunting but here some pictures of some well known and reputable American dealers: from these pictures is impossible to tell, the only way is the UV check.
A different kettle of fish are all the "cream" Daytona / Explorer and the Patrizzi 16250: while the 90's lume is in general starting to develop stronger patina, imo those dials can't change colors with time, cream Daytona and Explorer had a flaw in painting that showed immediately, and UV can't help to see if they were messed up.
Can OP post some examples of this phenomenon?
Here is a great example IMO. A 5513 L-series from 1990 will never get this 'patina' in a natural way:
https://chrono24.app/rolex/rolex-su...90s--id22645840.htm?SETLANG=da_DK&SETCURR=DKK
Here is a great example IMO. A 5513 L-series from 1990 will never get this 'patina' in a natural way:
https://chrono24.app/rolex/rolex-su...90s--id22645840.htm?SETLANG=da_DK&SETCURR=DKK