I think this is a really interesting conversation. My thoughts are as follows:
1. The Manhattan-style Connie isn’t to my taste but it’s a design statement and clearly it still has a strong market. Although I quite like the Globemaster, it occupies a space for me in between a sports watch and a dress watch (a little like the Aqua Terra). I’m therefore not sure that Omega sees the Constellation in the same way that it was viewed in the 50s and 60s - i.e. as a high-end dress watch.
2. I would love to see a reissue of many of Omega's classic designs of the 1960s but I don’t feel the market is there for it, and that would probably mean a limited edition like the Seamaster 1948. Long waiting lists, high prices and there is bound to be something that disappoints or annoys those familiar with the original references (I personally hate the caseback of the Seamaster 1948).
3. The vintage Connie market is still strong and those pieces are still highly sought after. How many new members have we seen appearing on OF asking for advice about a pie-pan Connie as their first vintage Omega purchase? There is also a lot of C-case love on here (myself included). If you want to wear a nice dress watch, I personally feel that going vintage is more economical than buying contemporary - and more of a talking point, too. And under a shirt cuff, 34-36mm feels just right.
😀
So I’m not holding out for a rehash of the Connie but I’ll watch where Omega takes the line next with interest. And for now, I’m happy with my vintage dress watches!