wagudc
·I love vintage mechanical watches. I enjoy preserving the history and supporting the craft of watchmaking. Most of my watches are worth less than $1000us, and many are less than $500. I do however need a few modern watches to wear on rainy days. New watches in the sub $1000 range will likely be equipped with a Miyota or Seiko movement, and it seems the standard practice for servicing/repairing these watches is a full movement swap. It really takes the fun out of owning a mechanical watch. If you are going to use a throw away movement, why not use a quartz movement? I understand the appeal of the higher end modern mechanical movements, but at the low-end and micro brand side of things I am beginning to think quartz is the way to go. I think my next purchase will be a 36mm Vaer quartz watch which isn't trying to be vintage but is a size I am used to with vintage watches. I would like to hear what you all think. I am tired of faux-vintage. Can we let vintage be vintage, and modern be modern?