The case for quartz watches

Posts
4,614
Likes
11,679
I love vintage mechanical watches. I enjoy preserving the history and supporting the craft of watchmaking. Most of my watches are worth less than $1000us, and many are less than $500. I do however need a few modern watches to wear on rainy days. New watches in the sub $1000 range will likely be equipped with a Miyota or Seiko movement, and it seems the standard practice for servicing/repairing these watches is a full movement swap. It really takes the fun out of owning a mechanical watch. If you are going to use a throw away movement, why not use a quartz movement? I understand the appeal of the higher end modern mechanical movements, but at the low-end and micro brand side of things I am beginning to think quartz is the way to go. I think my next purchase will be a 36mm Vaer quartz watch which isn't trying to be vintage but is a size I am used to with vintage watches. I would like to hear what you all think. I am tired of faux-vintage. Can we let vintage be vintage, and modern be modern?

C3-DN-QR-BR-36_1800x1800.jpg
 
Posts
9,058
Likes
47,019
Sounds reasonable to me. I'm not a fan of quartz watches, but I do own one as a beater. And I'll give credit where credit is due: even a cheap quartz movement is more accurate than the high end mechancial movement in my JLC.
 
Posts
751
Likes
1,334
Here's my quartz "beater". Most likely bought from an Italian Army PX. Vintage-ish PVD Squale with a dial from the GRACO XIII regiment.

If the movement ever goes, easy replacement.

33995710988_405f5948d5_b.jpg
 
Posts
9,887
Likes
47,162
My main quartz beater I need to adjust for daylight savings I find a couple quartz a necessity cause some mornings you don’t feel like messing about setting things I like your choice and try not turn my nose up at quartz many are just fine
 
Posts
2,737
Likes
4,326
I have a few, a Tag F1 from the early 90s, an Omega pre bond, a few Casio watches and a Hamilton PSR, which I think is an LED/quartz module. The main attraction for me is the aesthetics of a watch. The movement is a secondary consideration. To be honest, when I am rushing out the door to work, more often than not, I just put a quartz one on as it is a lot less hassle. Secondly they are just as much a part of horological history as mechanical watches, so I think it would be amiss to not have at least one in your collection.
 
Posts
3,386
Likes
8,549
My first quartz watch, and first Omega, was purchased when quartz was still new and expensive and the dial boasted the fact. My most recent watch was purchased now that quartz is cheap and mechanical is worth boasting about. Like @lillatroll I think aesthetics and purpose dictate the choice.



Hmmm, could have chosen a better time of day to take this 🙄
 
Posts
297
Likes
266
As fun as it is to bash quartz, sometimes it just makes sense!! I have a vintage Seamaster Professional 200M quartz, two Hamilton Masonic Masterpieces (ETA movements), and a Swiss Army. Sometimes it's easier to grab and go without worrying about winding, setting date etc.
 
Posts
1,431
Likes
5,840
Also, let's not overlook the world of high accuracy quartz watches. I love, love, love my Megaquartz 2.4. A lot of the early quartz watches were so expensive that they also had gorgeous finishing - I'm thinking of the Seiko with all 60 minute markers being applied.

If I had the money, I'd buy one of the new Citizens.
 
Posts
4,869
Likes
14,684
At my recent clock & watch collector’s meeting the topic turned to “what’s on your wrist?”. All the clock guys (mostly older gents) were sporting quartz and were proud of the accuracy and durability of them. Dudes totally into horology, and just liking what they like.

Quartz often feels soulless to me, but I love my Accutron tuning fork powered watch. 👎 Just me being elitist? Why do I want a Rolex when there are so many cheaper and just as nice watches out there? 👎 So much psychology at work

I was having a thought about getting the Hamilton Khaki quartz a few weeks ago - a good looking, affordable, non fussy and dependable weekend watch.
 
Posts
17,609
Likes
26,707
I won't lie... I grab my CasioOak becuase I do not have to worry about setting a watch at least a few times a week.
 
Posts
669
Likes
1,553
Quartz watches feel a bit soulless to me though you can't argue with their functionality. I have my late grandfathers Lorus which is over 30 years old and has only required battery changes during that time. He was a man who grew up with mechanical watches but when quartz came along he wore them from then on in. I wear my watches for aesthetics as anything else though and truth be told I still do a fair bit of time checking using my mobile.
 
Posts
12
Likes
3
After 20 years of gorgeous Oris, Bell and Ross and Omega autos, I'm loving the accuracy and aesthetics of my f300 Geneve. Not sure if this measures up to the criterion of 'easy replaceability' (i'm a total non-expert here) but YES to quartz. And like the Vaer, by the way. (New to me)