Why are vintage Omega Quartz watches looked down upon?

Posts
14,626
Likes
42,453
I don’t like quartz watches as collectibles! I am disinclined to get in to discussing my reasons!
 
Posts
13
Likes
6
There a lovers and non-lovers. For some people quartz watches have been and are the entrance door to a specific brand i.e. watches in general. Whilst e.g. mechanical watches might be more expensive.

Although there are many many exeptions from this "rule" - e.g Breitling Emergency 2 - a 15k quartz watch (if you vote for the titanium bracelet) and service costs at 1k to change the battery after 2 years
 
Posts
9,960
Likes
15,640
We love quartz or tuning forks. OMEGA has much more sofisticated movements than e.g. Breitling. Their 900.231 is a messy movement. The B232 is a much better upgrade (Pluton & Jupiter) but they are galaxies away from what OMEGA developed. Some calibers are high risk - f8192 & 2,4MHz. But many like 1620, 1640, 1655, 1342, 32 kHz or 1250 are fun. Enclosed a very rare f300 build only 500 times for OMEGAs 125th Anniversary. It can compete easily with a 125. And is much rarer. Kind regards

I’ll give you a pass on the fact you said quartz or tuning forks, but the SMF300 diver you show doesn’t belong in this thread since there is no quartz component in an f300 tuning fork movement.
 
Posts
13
Likes
6
I’ll give you a pass on the fact you said quartz or tuning forks, but the SMF300 diver you show doesn’t belong in this thread since there is no quartz component in an f300 tuning fork movement.

Its says quartz & tuning fork & it says cal. 1250 which is a f300 ...amongst others like 1260 ...based all on ESA 9162

Although the thread says quartz we (we = TiccTacc) put all battery driven watches in one category - "battery driven watches"


Kind regards
Edited:
 
Posts
1,113
Likes
13,303
There are several Omega tuning fork watches that I would love to own but cost to much for me to risk since I don't know if I would be able to keep them running for the rest of the time I am.

 
Posts
13
Likes
6
There are several Omega tuning fork watches that I would love to own but cost to much for me to risk since I don't know if I would be able to keep them running for the rest of the time I am.


Yes the "Lobster" is also among my personal top 3 OMEGA tuning fork watches. All watches based on f300 are pritty safe. Most important topic are the date wheel(s). To keep it/them in good shape never set them between 21:00 PM and 3:00 AM. So to be on the very safe side set them at 6:00 or 18:00.

There are good replacements from metal at ebay. So if you change them once or go for a general service use a metal one.

Another (very simple) "trick" to extend the life span of any tuning fork watch is - to pull the crown if you store the watch or dont wear it for some days. Than the "fork" stops moving totally - can be used for quartz watches with analog face as well.

Of course as with any battery driven item use only high quality batteries and exchange battery immediatelly when empty.
 
Posts
67
Likes
285
There are several Omega tuning fork watches that I would love to own but cost to much for me to risk since I don't know if I would be able to keep them running for the rest of the time I am.

think there are still repairers for tuning fork movements as unlike quartz they are easier to replace. Heaps of tuning fork Accutron users too still keeping them running and humming.
 
Posts
18
Likes
0
A quartz watch can last the user for 20/30 years, as the electronic components of the watch will eventually wear out. A well-maintained mechanical watch will outlive the original purchaser.
I have an original Constellation Manhattan from 1983 and it's as accurate as my Omega 1542. I bought the Omega because of the observatory on the back since I do astronomical observing and needed an accurate watch. However My Casio wva-470 (satellite time-calibration) is the most accurate watch I've ever owned, beating my Rolex, Omegas and Seikos hands down and that is what i use when timing astronomical events. Go figure 😀
 
Posts
21,826
Likes
49,510
I have an original Constellation Manhattan from 1983 and it's as accurate as my Omega 1542. I bought the Omega because of the observatory on the back since I do astronomical observing and needed an accurate watch. However My Casio wva-470 (satellite time-calibration) is the most accurate watch I've ever owned, beating my Rolex, Omegas and Seikos hands down and that is what i use when timing astronomical events. Go figure 😀
Go figure? Of course that’s the case. How would a mechanical watch possibly compete with an electronic watch that is synchronized to a time standard. 🙄
 
Posts
1,165
Likes
3,396
My 1987 quartz Connie is dead on accurate over a month with the NIST clock. Way better than any of my 5 master chronometers.
 
Posts
729
Likes
2,698
Unless seconds matter with what you are doing to make a living or the world will implode, I don't understand the importance of accuracy for a hobbyist. I occasionally find myself not even setting the time when wearing a mechanical watch as my computer, phone and my wife tells me the time frequently. I look at my wrist and admire the watch I chose for the day.
 
Posts
18
Likes
0
Go figure? Of course that’s the case. How would a mechanical watch possibly compete with an electronic watch that is synchronized to a time standard. 🙄
Hi Dan The Omegas are all Quartz, however the 1983 Manhattan is quartz/chronometer. The rolex is all mechanical.
 
Posts
21,826
Likes
49,510
Hi Dan The Omegas are all Quartz, however the 1983 Manhattan is quartz/chronometer. The rolex is all mechanical.
Fine, same thing, just substitute old quartz watch for mechanical.

I assume you understand the the Casio is synchronized to an atomic clock standard.
 
Posts
255
Likes
856
I do think it is interesting how the high end market completely spurned quartz at some point. And it did turn out to be a fad in high end watches. I think these responses are why, but they could he summed up that electronics are just not as reliable as mechanical.

Over a 20 year period, they might be superior, but watch collectors all have the question of where their watches might be in 100 years, rattling around in the back of their heads. We all know the electronics will be in museums, in dumps, and in very few watch collections.
 
Posts
14,626
Likes
42,453
I have three mechanical pocket watches in my collection that at one point required balance staffs. All three are 19th century models. No replacement parts available. First, these watches are all over 125 years old. Contemplate a quartz watch lasting that long! When I was unable to buy balance staffs for these three, I hand-made balance staffs for them! The watches are today, not in the landfill! I have a real nice quartz Omega dress watch in my projects drawer. It is a pre-Swatch Omega. It needs a circuit assembly. Only possible source might be sending the watch to Switzerland in hopes something can be done. It’s not worth what it would cost if Switzerland was able to fix it. Quartz watches considered less collectible? Is there any wonder?
 
Posts
2,491
Likes
3,968
Quartz watches considered less collectible?
Good, keep saying that, so there are more out there for those of us who play with microelectronics.

I found focusing on the 134x series to be quite entertaining. Yes the motors seem to fail. I have not actually programmed a modern controller to replace the electronics, but that should not be difficult.

These were done before the stamped riveted parts what are used in common quartz, with a simple compass motor with like two poles. There is some friction stamping and the time setting is really weird, which is why I find them interesting.

Most quartz though use injection molded parts. So these are not going to be around much once the plastic disintegrates and turns back into oil or short chain polymers (microplastics.) Curious I got a Tissot Autolub, which has the all plastic movement, but the case is metal. Externally it looks like any other watch of that era.

It is hard to predict the future of collecting. When I started watchmakers made staffs and stems. Dials were repainted, and cases buffed to mirror shiny. Most likely things that are completely untouched, and not even working will be admired more for originality. That was the trend in doll collecting. I see the trend here as well.

The pipe organ stuff petered out quicker than I expected. These went from theaters, to private homes, then to pizza restraints, then back to private homes and warehouses. Occasionally finding their way back to theaters and sometimes churches. Although classical organs are a different breed entirely. Merry-go-round fairgrounds organs (calliopes) like I collect are too loud to play in public. Now have to operate in soundproof boxes. It helps to have a barn or warehouse, or a friend with a warehouse or barn that will give one a key to it. Some people think they should be in museums, but museums are about the endowment legacy.

According to my mentor who passed some 20 years back, there is a lot of quarts history that is lost. He said there were 30 watch factory startups in the silicon valley. There were some examples in a dusty corner of the museum in la-chaux-de-fonds that he showed me. Who knows if the musuem will keep them on display, or even bother with them.

I have some quartz given out in cerial boxes and fast food kids meals. That pretty much sums up the value of the genera. On the other hand I think the Goldeneye watch was quartz. So they did make an effort. I did not like the design at the time since it looked big and clunkey. Still it sort of does grow on one, and if I had a time machine, I probably would have targeted some SM 300s (with mechanical movements.)
 
Posts
7,553
Likes
34,642
I had a few Omega quartz in great condition, I never wore them, but still nice to look at. I got tired of taking them to my WM once every year or so for a battery change and then bringing them home and putting back into a box. A waste of time that isn't necessary with a seldom worn mechanical. So I sold them all off with no regrets.
 
Posts
18
Likes
0
Fine, same thing, just substitute old quartz watch for mechanical.

I assume you understand the the Casio is synchronized to an atomic clock standard.
Yes thank you Dan I'm aware of that fact and that's why I use the Casio to time celestial occultations since it recalibrates itself 5x every night and i'm assured of observed astronomical events being timed accurately to the second. I just thought it somewhat funny a $100 watch (when I originally purchased it) would beat officially certified chronometers. I was expecting too much of the chronometers i guess. Not trying to push sale of Casio either.