Canuck
·I don’t like quartz watches as collectibles! I am disinclined to get in to discussing my reasons!
We love quartz or tuning forks. OMEGA has much more sofisticated movements than e.g. Breitling. Their 900.231 is a messy movement. The B232 is a much better upgrade (Pluton & Jupiter) but they are galaxies away from what OMEGA developed. Some calibers are high risk - f8192 & 2,4MHz. But many like 1620, 1640, 1655, 1342, 32 kHz or 1250 are fun. Enclosed a very rare f300 build only 500 times for OMEGAs 125th Anniversary. It can compete easily with a 125. And is much rarer. Kind regards
I’ll give you a pass on the fact you said quartz or tuning forks, but the SMF300 diver you show doesn’t belong in this thread since there is no quartz component in an f300 tuning fork movement.
There are several Omega tuning fork watches that I would love to own but cost to much for me to risk since I don't know if I would be able to keep them running for the rest of the time I am.
There are several Omega tuning fork watches that I would love to own but cost to much for me to risk since I don't know if I would be able to keep them running for the rest of the time I am.
A quartz watch can last the user for 20/30 years, as the electronic components of the watch will eventually wear out. A well-maintained mechanical watch will outlive the original purchaser.
R rdiiorioI have an original Constellation Manhattan from 1983 and it's as accurate as my Omega 1542. I bought the Omega because of the observatory on the back since I do astronomical observing and needed an accurate watch. However My Casio wva-470 (satellite time-calibration) is the most accurate watch I've ever owned, beating my Rolex, Omegas and Seikos hands down and that is what i use when timing astronomical events. Go figure 😀
Quartz watches considered less collectible?
Fine, same thing, just substitute old quartz watch for mechanical.
I assume you understand the the Casio is synchronized to an atomic clock standard.