The Aviators Thread

Posts
4,665
Likes
17,660
Thanks I will let them know because surely they are oblivious to this fact...oh, and Happy Canada Day too...

Maybe it is all the celebration fireworks adding to it ;0)
 
Posts
1,316
Likes
2,461
Forest management is essential, yet routinely under-funded. We've seen the direct effects in California in the past couple of years.

Now, rather than getting political, I can blend the two topics back into an aviation one. Check this out: it's who you know 😎 gots me a new hat
 
Posts
27,701
Likes
70,395
Forest management is essential, yet routinely under-funded. We've seen the direct effects in California in the past couple of years.

The scale of Canada is easily misunderstood by people from other countries, even (especially?) our closest neighbour. So just to put this into some perspective...

The population of Canada is about the same as the state of California - 40 million. That is spread over a vast area, with 90% of our population located within 160 kms (100 miles for those metrically challenged) from the US border. The average population density of California is 258 people per square mile - here it's 10 people per square mile. Again it's mostly concentrated on a little strip of land next to the US border, so the areas in question (where the fires are) are either very sparsely, or not populated at all for the most part.

The Canadian boreal forest covers 60% of our land mass, with most of it with no access by roads, rail, or any other means than by air if there is a lake nearby that you can land on. It is the largest intact forest on the planet - the green part below.



The boreal forest in Canada is over 13 times the size of California. Much of terrain is inaccessible, so the idea we would just "manage" it better is easily said, but rather more difficult to actually do. No one is going in there to clear the out underbrush for example, which is one of the things I saw California criticized for in their last round of fires. It's simply not possible with the amount of forest that there is and how inaccessible it is. Fire is a part of the lifecycle of the forest - always has been. Some of the fires that are in these remote areas are just left to burn, because trying to fight them would be fruitless, and would just put the lives of the firefighters in danger.

90% of the land the boreal forest is on is owned by the provinces, and another 5% is owned by the federal government. The management of fires is the jurisdiction of the provinces. They prioritize the fires around population centers, as would be expected.

No one likes the smoke, no one likes to be torn from their home, have to stay inside because the air quality is horrendous. But to suggest there is a simple answer here is rather absurd given the scale of what we are dealing with...
 
Posts
1,316
Likes
2,461
@Archer
On behalf of many of us: thank you for providing more information more concisely than just about any news outlet available!

Apologies if it came across that I was suggesting this problem to be a simple one. More, on the general topic of forest management, I was speaking to what I know of our domestic funding issues down here, which is why I specifically mentioned California. In fact, what I didn't communicate clearly enough was that I'm a proponent of the natural process fire plays in that ecosystem and I do NOT advocate the preservation of undergrowth (read: fuel) as we've seen governments do in some of our western states. It just sets the table for big fire. But then, as you point out, the proximity to people & structures is vastly different here than it is up there.

Granted, the severe terrain in most of northern Canada would hinder efforts to do prescribed burns on any large scale, as you also present. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if governments decide to (or not to) attempt to increase that effort to the tune of a veritable pile of money, even if for no other reason than to placate the public in a, "hey, we're trying!" sort of way. Here's hoping that the scale of fires this season actually has a positive effect on reducing available fuel across the risk area. It does seem that, even if we could all magically stop these fires tomorrow, we're only a lightning strike away from another blaze.

These Fire Boss guys have been stationed at my base of operations all summer. Excellent group of aviators, ground crew, and firefighters. I've been providing occasional maintenance on the SEATS and their Commanders over the past several weeks and was gifted the hat (and even a cigar!) by the crew.

I can't imagine doing this type of flying. Truly nomadic, high-stakes, and emotionally taxing. Add to that the aforementioned funding uncertainty every season and it's no wonder these operations are stressful.
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
4,332
Pretty happy about two more WW2 fighter plane ID plates.
I haven't figured out how the aircraft restoration owners are getting
the information about backgrounds on individual fighters. These are rare planes
with only 1 survivor each, which means only one complete aircraft each
currently in existence.

There is also a franken D4Y3 that is back half D4Y1
and front half D4Y3 in California. The complete D4Y1 front to back D4Y1 is the only plane of it's kind in existence.


The Mitsubishi Raiden J2M3 serial number 2204


This particular tag is very special since it is for a prototype J2M3 Raiden-Kai



The next aircraft is also extremely rare.

The Aichi Built J4Y-C Type 2 Reconn Suisei Comet serial number 6424

Edited:
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
4,332


I am not sure how many aviation enthusiasts who like war planes realize how much work the United States Airforce is doing to preserve Japanese war planes. These people are amazing and the work they are doing to restore such rare airplanes that were pretty much abandoned projects from the 1970s that have been rediscovered, traded, and finally found funding and talented people who can restore the scrap metal into museum pieces again.
I am sure the specifications must be in Japanese which might make fabrication even more challenging.

https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/V...e/196250/kawanishi-n1k2-ja-shiden-kai-george/


050728-F-1234P-019.JPG

070329-F-1234P-004.JPG

070329-F-1234P-007.JPG

070329-F-1234P-006.JPG

070329-F-1234P-020.JPG

140421-F-IO108-019.JPG
Edited:
 
Posts
6,260
Likes
11,590
Connecting with this topic (60 years ago, F-104G "Free World Defender" demonstration by the Right Stuff)
https://omegaforums.net/threads/new-tvshow-the-right-stuff.113336/
👍
Snap& click scale model of USAF F-104C FG907, delivered in January 1959 it already crashed on January 29, 1959 at George AFB, California.
The pilot,479th TFW 434th TFS Ops Officer Capt Eddie "Ed" Skelton, ejected safely using the downward ejection seat !!!
(Photo: MWU).
.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,060
Likes
5,782
Connecting with this topic (60 years ago, F-104G "Free World Defender" demonstration by the Right Stuff)
https://omegaforums.net/threads/new-tvshow-the-right-stuff.113336/
👍
Snap& click scale model of USAF F-104C FG907, delivered in January 1959 it already crashed on January 29, 1959 at George AFB, California.
The pilot,479th TFW 434th TFS Ops Officer Capt Eddie "Ed" Skelton, ekejected safely using the downward ejection seat !!!
(Photo: MWU).
.
A Shelby Cobra Super Snake with stub wings. I heard a joke once that this is the only production aircraft that had more crashes than airframes produced.
 
Posts
1,459
Likes
2,796
The F-104 was a tricky aircraft to fly for sure. Imagine how fast you'd have to fly to generate the lift needed using such a tiny wing with very little camber, especially when you're trying to land. Scary.
 
Posts
27,701
Likes
70,395
The F-104 was a tricky aircraft to fly for sure. Imagine how fast you'd have to fly to generate the lift needed using such a tiny wing with very little camber, especially when you're trying to land. Scary.

Lawn dart...
 
Posts
16,772
Likes
152,389
Travelled on the first 'Shuttle' all equipped for fog conditions and we all received a torch 😀

 
Posts
1,060
Likes
5,782
Travelled on the first 'Shuttle' all equipped for fog conditions and we all received a torch 😀

Was it a Trident ? I flew on one between Dublin and London when I was just a kid.
 
Posts
1,459
Likes
2,796
Travelled on the first 'Shuttle' all equipped for fog conditions and we all received a torch 😀

Ah, those were the days. When airlines actually gave you decent freebies like playing cards, chess sets and toiletries packs...
 
Posts
1,114
Likes
559
The connection. Canadair, us air force and us navy with ejército del aire. The starfighter is very much missed in spain.
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
4,332
I had to go see three of the rarest WW2 planes in existence at the Planes of Fame in Chino California.

The only 99% original flying Zero in existence even to this day. Designed by Jiro Horikoshi.
He was an innovator that made Japans first all metal fighter, introduced flat rivets and flush
screws, introduced retractable landing gear, and created the most agile fighter possible.
tW1snnF.jpg

The POF Raiden is the world's only remaining Raiden. This plane was also designed by Jiro Horikoshi. This is a huge MARS
bomber engine with a fighter built around it. Very maneuverable by Allied standards, but difficult to fly by less experienced
Japanese pilots at the late stage of the war. The design may hold the record for the fastest climbing interceptor of that era.
It imitates the markings of Raiden 352-20 flown by Yoshihiro Aoki
iPi9ur2.jpg

The only D4Y3 (well sort of) in existence. It's really a frankenship of a D4Y3 front and D4Y1 tail.
brzKNnG.jpg

And after weeks of waiting to see what US Customs Agents were going to do with my identification
tags for the only Prototype Raiden Kai J2M3. It arrived. That would have been sad to see this remnant
of the fastest Interceptors of WW2 in battle lost forever or destroyed by Customs Agents.
I also have a rare prototype "Type 2 High Speed Naval Carrier Reconnaissance" version of the D4Y1.

Top Left: Zero Fighter
Top Right: Nakajima built Zero Fighter A6M2 Type 21 Carrier Based
Bottom Left: D4Y1 Suisei (Comet)
Bottom Middle: Prototype J2M3 Raiden Kai (Thunder, next version)
Bottom Right: Prototype "Type 2 High Speed Naval Carrier Based Reconnaissance" (Reconn Derivative of D4Y1 Comet)
1dxYT12.jpg

Several artists interpret the Raiden as capable of this near vertical pursuit to get to the 30,000 feet cruising heights of the B-29 in a few minutes from the ground.

The climb rate of the 1940s Raiden Kai was about 4000 feet per minute.
The Boeing 747 climb rate was about 4000 feet per minute.
Climb rate of the F6F in comparison was 2300 feet per minute.
AgUeuE8.png

The worlds last D4Y1, it is in Japan.
Edited:
 
Posts
5,173
Likes
47,009
@Seiji when I visited the Commemorative Air Force collection at the Camarillo Airport (about 2.5 hrs drive west of Chino) I recall seeing another Zero restoration underway. It will have an American-made engine I believe, so maybe not as authentic as other examples. If you're able, you should check it out!
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
4,332
@Seiji when I visited the Commemorative Air Force collection at the Camarillo Airport (about 2.5 hrs drive west of Chino) I recall seeing another Zero restoration underway. It will have an American-made engine I believe, so maybe not as authentic as other examples. If you're able, you should check it out!

Thank you! I will definitely have to look at the Commemorative Air Force collection. I am amazed at how many collections are in Southern California of WW2 Aircraft. We are truly in one of the better locations for historical planes. I have also been intending to go to the San Diego
Air and Space museum for quite sometime.

I will try to see the Zero project at CAF!
 
Posts
16,772
Likes
152,389
Was it a Trident ? I flew on one between Dublin and London when I was just a kid.

Sadly the old memory is fading 🙁