Speedy Tuesday - Hands-On With The Speedmaster Enamel Dial 50th Anniversary From 2007

Posts
1,562
Likes
5,665
Speedmaster-Moon-Limited-1957-311.33.42.50.01.001.001.jpg
In 2007, Omega celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Speedmaster family. In my opinion, there is one very special member of this group that is too often overlooked. Perhaps reference 311.33.42.50.01.001.001 is shunned for its enamel dial. Maybe it’s down to its F. Piguet based 3201 movement. Whatever the cause for its past neglect, it’s about […]

Visit Speedy Tuesday - Hands-On With The Speedmaster Enamel Dial 50th Anniversary From 2007 to read the full article.
 
Posts
660
Likes
4,255
Didn’t know about this reference, really like the gorgeous transparent case back (and 100m water resistance).
Thanks RJ 😀
 
Posts
1,819
Likes
5,923
I remember when this one came out, the anticipation was so high and the Omega community was...not happy. Not sure which was more hated - the dial or the movement. Looking at it now it isn't as bad as I remember but I still don't grasp what they were thinking marking such big anniversary with a non-Lemania movement. There was one unsold at a local AD well into the 2010s.
 
Posts
1,562
Likes
5,665
I remember when this one came out, the anticipation was so high and the Omega community was...not happy. Not sure which was more hated - the dial or the movement. Looking at it now it isn't as bad as I remember but I still don't grasp what they were thinking marking such big anniversary with a non-Lemania movement. There was one unsold at a local AD well into the 2010s.

Hello Andy,

I also remember this one very well. I think it was the price that set some people off because it was much more expensive than the regular Moonwatch (which was around 2700 Euro if I am not mistaken). I get the small hints at the 50th anniversary, with a vintage wordmark and, but the caliber 3201 movement was indeed a bit awkward. Nice movement though, with a column-wheel mechanism, as well as being chronometer certified. I think, that Omega just wasn't capable of doing those exact and much more precise tributes at the time. The first 'tribute' or re-edition Omega did that really wowed me was the 2009 Ploprof.

Anyway, thanks for your comment.
 
Posts
215
Likes
297
I dig the very subtle difference in the dial, thanks for sharing. Definitely a forgotten model!
 
Posts
1,819
Likes
5,923
I think, that Omega just wasn't capable of doing those exact and much more precise tributes at the time. The first 'tribute' or re-edition Omega did that really wowed me was the 2009 Ploprof.
I agree 100%.

So I fished this out of TZ's archives: https://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=msg&goto=2636433&rid=58557#msg_2636433
Interesting to see the reactions from back then. And nice seeing lots of comments from Chuck Maddox. Here's one thing he said:

If one looks to all of the posts/threads/replies about what people would like to see in a 50th anniversary model, nearly all of the replies/posts pointed towards a model evocative with suggestions like: c.321, Straight lugged cases, emulation of CK2915's, CK2998's, or even 105.003's. What did Omega produce? A current model with a "tarted up" dial. [shakes head sadly] While Omega may or may not view the discussions in these and other forums, they certainly aren't taking heed to what folks are saying.
Interesting that in the years since, they did take heed and pretty much have made all of those. They still do tarted up dials now and then too😁!
 
Posts
799
Likes
721
I'd be more than happy to own this one. That case back is really interesting.
 
Posts
430
Likes
398
The box and its content is awesome.
Oh the watch as well 😉
 
Posts
7,092
Likes
22,998
Maybe I was less picky when I was younger, but I thought, hey, column wheel chronograph, Speedmaster, vitreous enamel dial? fυck yeah!
 
Posts
733
Likes
1,457
Aah, the memories. thx for the writeup.

I used to own one. Sold it. Regret it slightly. The enamel dial , although lacking the depth and charm of the vintage stepped dials, was spectacular with its glossy sheen.
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
2,213
I would have been all over this one. Beautiful dial, fine movement and good WR, and a cool box that doesn't require extra storage to house.
 
Posts
64
Likes
74
This was the model that pushed me over the edge into Speedmasters, and I'm glad I got one. I view it as the luxe Speedy, the ultimate sapphire sandwich!
 
Posts
194
Likes
247
Sorry for bringing this thread out of the dead, but anybody thinking of putting the new 3861 bracelet on the 50th ann and wasnt sure it would work, well it does 👍
 
Posts
118
Likes
136
I'm curious what a black enamel dial would look like compared to a standard Speedy dial. Omega seems to have a nice stable and history of enamel dials, including this one that I think looks pretty great in gold:
 
Posts
33,176
Likes
37,901
I remember this reference when new, an AD in the CBD mall near me had one in the window that they would have all laid out with its accessories and elaborate box and they’d put it away in the vault every evening. 6 years later it was still in the window and the box was starting to separate at the hinges from being used so much. It’s a cool and interesting piece with a unique movement but at the time it was such a price shock that people wouldn’t touch it.
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,372
I’ve got that movement in a 3313 form, and I can tell you it’s silky buttery smooth.
 
Posts
1,540
Likes
1,962
Thank to Robert i know now from where my prototype dials where planned for 😀))