Community Stories

Speedy choice

E
Posts
10
Likes
6
Hi all.

I'm in strong doubts about two options of Speedmaster:

1. Moonwatch SS.
2. 57 with sandwich dial.

I really don't care a lot about price difference and space fairytale (otherwise I buy Sturmanskie).

Wrist size - 7.5 inches.
Racing looks a bit thick. Manual winding is not a problem. Date absence is more a plus - easier to set a watch.

What are your thoughts?
 
omega-speedmaster-_57-co-axial-master-chronometer-chronograph-40-5-mm-33210415101001-l-03d83f.jpg omega-speedmaster-profe-chronometer-chronograph-42-mm-31030425001002-l-0dcc62.jpg
YY77
Posts
5,761
Likes
27,147
I found the numbers on the '57 bezel quite invisible giving it different look to the watch, the lugs and endlinks are also designed in a way it looks too big on the wrist, so moonwatch would be my choice, just perfect.
 
Donn Chambers
Posts
2,669
Likes
3,550
It really comes down to which style you prefer - the classic chronograph layout and stick hands, or the broad arrow hands and new two-register layout.

Otherwise, either would be a great choice in my opinion. One thing, if you do plan to time things on a regular basis (especially things under 30 minutes), I think the classic Speedy Pro layout is far easier to read.
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
Donn Chambers Donn Chambers
It really comes down to which style you prefer - the classic chronograph layout and stick hands, or the broad arrow hands and new two-register layout.

Otherwise, either would be a great choice in my opinion. One thing, if you do plan to time things on a regular basis (especially things under 30 minutes), I think the classic Speedy Pro layout is far easier to read.
I like both styles. But my eyes are not perfect already - some problems with tiny details. I hardly see the date on my Aquaterra without glasses.
 
Evitzee
Posts
7,561
Likes
13,959
Try them both on at an AD or OB and see which one is more compelling. Both are usually in stock. I never found the two dial layout that attractive, but that's just personal preference.
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
Evitzee Evitzee
Try them both on at an AD or OB and see which one is more compelling. Both are usually in stock. I never found the two dial layout that attractive, but that's just personal preference.
It's possible I'm wrong but I find 99xx movement more interesting.
 
itsjustausername
Posts
352
Likes
1,423
I empathize with your dilemma; it's nearly impossible to decide which Speedmaster to possibly add to my watchbox! The sandwich dial on that 57 is a compelling feature, but does it stack up against the Pro? Only you can tell...
 
FCA
Posts
116
Likes
1,063
Try them both and if you still can't decide then take the moonwatch.
You actually can't go wrong with this, maybe it also sells better if it comes to that.
Is it for daily use or do you rotate between other watches?
I'm not sure if the faux patina would work for me on a daily beater.
 
JPE.88305
Posts
921
Likes
10,682
If you don't need a date complication, the layout and legibility of the moonwatch work well.
maybe consider a '57 trilogy (I believe there's one for sale in the marketplace)--a little more expensive tho similar vibe as the above '57 but conventional speedmaster layout and no date (3 subdials) as well as SS back.
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
FCA FCA
Try them both and if you still can't decide then take the moonwatch.
You actually can't go wrong with this, maybe it also sells better if it comes to that.
Is it for daily use or do you rotate between other watches?
I'm not sure if the faux patina would work for me on a daily beater.
I have Aquaterra Small Seconds, Raketa Sputnik 1 and some others to choose. I think every new watch will be a part of rotation cycle)
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
JPE.88305 JPE.88305
If you don't need a date complication, the layout and legibility of the moonwatch work well.
maybe consider a '57 trilogy (I believe there's one for sale in the marketplace)--a little more expensive tho similar vibe as the above '57 but conventional speedmaster layout and no date (3 subdials) as well as SS back.
The killer choice for me is Moonwatch with manual 99xx onboard. As for '57 trilogy - I'm not a big fan of old movements. '57 looks interesting mostly for sandwich dial and new movement.
 
befobe
Posts
1,545
Likes
9,916
No doubt for me.... speedmaster=3 sub dials.
So... my choice is done...😉
 
FCA
Posts
116
Likes
1,063
E Evgtok
I have Aquaterra Small Seconds, Raketa Sputnik 1

The Aquaterra is a nice looking watch... with broad arrow hand like the 57-model. IMO the speedy would be the right choice but in the end only you can decide.

My Raketa says hello... my speedy too 😀

IMG_0496.JPG IMG_4866.jpg
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
FCA FCA
The Aquaterra is a nice looking watch... with broad arrow hand like the 57-model. IMO the speedy would be the right choice but in the end only you can decide.

My Raketa says hello... my speedy too 😀

IMG_0496.JPG IMG_4866.jpg
IMG_0917.jpeg IMG_0911.jpeg
 
STANDY
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,859
You know it’s the standard Moon Watch with Hesalite and solid case back.
Get over the something else stuff and buy the real deal.

IMG_0530.jpeg
Edited:
 
JPE.88305
Posts
921
Likes
10,682
E Evgtok
The killer choice for me is Moonwatch with manual 99xx onboard. As for '57 trilogy - I'm not a big fan of old movements. '57 looks interesting mostly for sandwich dial and new movement.
The 1861 is only "old" by a few years, and the 3861 isn't assumed by all to be a superior movement. Newer, yes.
Otherwise if you want a sandwich dial and don't care about the "space fairytale" stuff try the 3861 sapphire sandwich.
Or since you don't care about the "space fairytale" (which is part of the inherent draw of the watch) go for something with less fairytale lore/history/pedigree.
 
noelekal
Posts
6,495
Likes
50,151
E Evgtok
Hi all.

I'm in strong doubts about two options of Speedmaster:

1. Moonwatch SS.
2. 57 with sandwich dial.

I really don't care a lot about price difference and space fairytale (otherwise I buy Sturmanskie).

Wrist size - 7.5 inches.
Racing looks a bit thick. Manual winding is not a problem. Date absence is more a plus - easier to set a watch.

What are your thoughts?

I'll take door number two!
 
E
Posts
10
Likes
6
JPE.88305 JPE.88305
The 1861 is only "old" by a few years, and the 3861 isn't assumed by all to be a superior movement. Newer, yes.
Otherwise if you want a sandwich dial and don't care about the "space fairytale" stuff try the 3861 sapphire sandwich.
Or since you don't care about the "space fairytale" (which is part of the inherent draw of the watch) go for something with less fairytale lore/history/pedigree.
To be clear I'm from the country with own rich space history and local space watches. That's why Moonwatch's magic is not so strong on me. It doesn't matter that MW has a great history - I really respect all NASA and Omega wins. But is this case I look on Moonwatch like on a watch. I like new movements and materials but some vintage designs look still great.
I really like both watches and don't hurry to make a choice. But now see most vote for MW)
 
3 More Posts...
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

Mute

Speedy choice

Mute Modern Omega Watches
drhex
drhex
Posts
27
Views
2K
R

GADA watch 4 choices

rathman1 Modern Omega Watches
lillatroll
lillatroll
Posts
68
Views
8K
T

If the Chinese beat the USA in this 2nd space race, will it take some luster from the Speedy?

TradeWinds577 Modern Omega Watches
SpeedyPhill
SpeedyPhill
Posts
29
Views
2K
Felix_La_PuBelle

My first classic Speedy

Felix_La_PuBelle Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
hansaboy
hansaboy
Posts
12
Views
311
dootcho

Neil Armstrong’s commemorative gold Speedy coming up for auction

dootcho Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Emeister
Emeister
Posts
45
Views
4K
H

My first speedy... too slow, or just fine?

harrisonjr98 Modern Omega Watches
4011021
4011021
Posts
11
Views
1K