Speedy 145.022 dials - long / short S & R

Posts
372
Likes
571
Hi All

I've got 145.022-78 s/n 44820xxx

It came with this dial, i.e. short "S" & "r" at either end of "Speedmaster"

1344569-b6ff0c3239b896e54d1fbc18abf0ba41.jpg

Is that right? Or a service replacement? Curious to know when the longer letters were used and if they co-existed with the shorter ones.

Thanks
 
Posts
4,738
Likes
21,015
Checking MWO it would have been a C3 dial, so seems to me this is a service replacement C5 dial;

16520223083083265896890546091905.jpg 16520223491634174364417310411962.jpg 16520222194663427302451172110106.jpg
 
Posts
372
Likes
571
Checking MWO it would have been a C3 dial, so seems to me this is a service replacement C5 dial

THANKS very much appreciated.
 
Posts
17,464
Likes
26,387
Yes that’s a much later dial, most likely acquired in a service of the serial is in the correct range for a -78 and it’s not a mismatched caseback.
 
Posts
372
Likes
571
Yes that’s a much later dial, most likely acquired in a service of the serial is in the correct range for a -78 and it’s not a mismatched caseback.

Well, it came with a service replacement caseback (“145.002” and underneath that “345.002” -- presumably doing double duty and serving both references?). However I have since sourced a -78 caseback for it from a member here as it clearly seems to be in the right range. (Although it could be post-78: the 44 million serials seems to be all over the place: I've seen EoAs ranging from 1978 to 1984.)

It's had a hard life but it was very cheap and I do really like it, so happy to have it and (more importantly) I love it and wear it almost all the time.
 
Posts
17,464
Likes
26,387
145.0022 is not really a reference. It’s the part number of the case.