TheGreatKat
·I found this Speedmaster Soyuz to be auctioned soon and wanted to share with you some of my thoughts. Also asks some experts here what they think.
It’s a sought-after model but it seems like those watches gained even more attention lastly.
This one have 5mm pushers intead of 5.5 and the patina mostly dropped of, which makes it less attractive than many of them.
The estimates looks high for me. But who knows…the one from Phillips Geneva action in May last year was sold for $113k and it also had wrong pushers (and I don;t think they're easy to replace...) Definitely I found one below has less attractive dial. And the one from Phillips was actually estimate really low (12k - 20k), which those big auction houses does quite often to estimate lower that one would think. Here we have opposite tactic.
Interesting thing is that Soyuz from Phillips had movement No. 39.180.975 and number 76. Here we have movement No. 39.180.979 and number 80. If I wouldn’t know others I could think it’s so straight and easy with all of them. But it's not.
What do you think? Any thoughts on that one?
https://www.artcurial.com/en/lot-om...f-st-145022-ndeg-39180979-vers-1976-m1099-269
It’s a sought-after model but it seems like those watches gained even more attention lastly.
This one have 5mm pushers intead of 5.5 and the patina mostly dropped of, which makes it less attractive than many of them.
The estimates looks high for me. But who knows…the one from Phillips Geneva action in May last year was sold for $113k and it also had wrong pushers (and I don;t think they're easy to replace...) Definitely I found one below has less attractive dial. And the one from Phillips was actually estimate really low (12k - 20k), which those big auction houses does quite often to estimate lower that one would think. Here we have opposite tactic.
Interesting thing is that Soyuz from Phillips had movement No. 39.180.975 and number 76. Here we have movement No. 39.180.979 and number 80. If I wouldn’t know others I could think it’s so straight and easy with all of them. But it's not.
What do you think? Any thoughts on that one?
https://www.artcurial.com/en/lot-om...f-st-145022-ndeg-39180979-vers-1976-m1099-269